2018
DOI: 10.1108/ijmpb-02-2017-0016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Business user impact on information system projects

Abstract: Purpose There are differing views and results in the literature regarding whether the user’s participation has a positive or negative impact, if any, on the success of an information system (IS) project. The purpose of this paper is to develop a comprehensive model with four main hypotheses to test the relationships between seven constructs using survey data conducted in the USA. Design/methodology/approach The authors develop a structural equation model (SEM) with four constructs defining the activities the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alpha reliability for the scale was 0.92. To measure project success, we used a 6-item scale developed by Robey et al (1993) consistent with Eichhorn and Tukel (2018) with little modification. The sample item included "The amount of work I produced."…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alpha reliability for the scale was 0.92. To measure project success, we used a 6-item scale developed by Robey et al (1993) consistent with Eichhorn and Tukel (2018) with little modification. The sample item included "The amount of work I produced."…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also facilitated by meeting user expectations and satisfaction. This theme is widely debated in literature as the users can dictate whether an IS project is a failure or a success (Bradford & Oya, 2018;Joseph et al, 2014;Petter et al, 2013). The output of an IS project can be rejected if underutilised by users and the initiative will be questioned if benefits are not realised (Bradford & Oya, 2018;Marnewick et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This theme is widely debated in literature as the users can dictate whether an IS project is a failure or a success (Bradford & Oya, 2018;Joseph et al, 2014;Petter et al, 2013). The output of an IS project can be rejected if underutilised by users and the initiative will be questioned if benefits are not realised (Bradford & Oya, 2018;Marnewick et al, 2017). It is imperative to include users during the IS project development cycle to facilitate improved user experience (Marnewick et al, 2017;Serrador & Pinto, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In ISD projects, user representatives can play a pivotal role in spanning knowledge boundaries in the pursuit of knowledge integration within the project (Pan and Mao, 2016). In many ISD project teams, instead of limiting their role to that of the information source, user representatives act as co-creators together with their technology-oriented peers, to the extent that the distinction between business domain experts and IT experts becomes less apparent (Eichhorn, 2014). If spanning knowledge boundaries on the syntactic, semantic and pragmatic level may positively influence ISD project performance and product quality (Wang et al, 2016), we need more insights on how to approach knowledge boundary spanning in ISD projects.…”
Section: Knowledge Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%