1992
DOI: 10.1097/00004850-199200710-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buspirone induced prolactin responses in obsessive—compulsive disorder (OCD)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To dissect the mechanism of action underlying the OCD symptoms inducing properties of mCPP, studies with more selective agents are warranted. Several agents have already been tested, including ipsapirone and buspirone (5-HT IA receptor agonists) (Lesch et al 1991;Lucey et al 1992;Pigott et al 1992), ondansetron (5-HT 3 antagonist) (Broocks et al 1992) and MK-212 (5-HT 1A , 5-HT 1B and 5-HT 2C receptor agonist) (Bastani et al 1990). All were found to be ine¤ective in inducing obsessive compulsive symptoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To dissect the mechanism of action underlying the OCD symptoms inducing properties of mCPP, studies with more selective agents are warranted. Several agents have already been tested, including ipsapirone and buspirone (5-HT IA receptor agonists) (Lesch et al 1991;Lucey et al 1992;Pigott et al 1992), ondansetron (5-HT 3 antagonist) (Broocks et al 1992) and MK-212 (5-HT 1A , 5-HT 1B and 5-HT 2C receptor agonist) (Bastani et al 1990). All were found to be ine¤ective in inducing obsessive compulsive symptoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar blunted responses to fenfluramine challenge have been reported in depressed patients (12,15). Considering the fact that the prolactin response to fenfluramine is mediated through 5-HT receptors -subtype 2A and 2C, it is conceivable that these receptor subtypes are involved in the pathogenesis of OCD (13). The notion of altered sensitivity is, not easily explained in therm of a super-or subsensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The PRL responses in the OCD sample (321 + 98 mU/1) and in the controls (291 +50 mU/1) were not significantly different [F= (1,87) 0.75, p = 0.75 ]. Allowing for the possibility of a type 2 error, the data do not suggest that the central 5-HT attenuation in OCD involves dysfunction at the 5-HT,A receptor(Lucey et al, 1992b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%