Constructionist Controversies 2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781315080505-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

But Seriously Folks: The Limitations of the Strict Constructionist Interpretation of Social Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, the journal Qualitative Sociology Review devoted an entire issue to the continuing relevance of the perspective and new frontiers that social constructionists are exploring. Social constructionists such as Best (2003Best ( , 2012Best ( , 2015, Ibarra and Kitsuse (2003), and Holstein and Miller (2003), to name just a few, have contributed significantly to the ongoing conceptual evolution of the perspective. For the purposes of this paper, however, the refinements proposed by sociologist Donileen Loseke are particularly pivotal.…”
Section: The Social Construction Of Social Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the journal Qualitative Sociology Review devoted an entire issue to the continuing relevance of the perspective and new frontiers that social constructionists are exploring. Social constructionists such as Best (2003Best ( , 2012Best ( , 2015, Ibarra and Kitsuse (2003), and Holstein and Miller (2003), to name just a few, have contributed significantly to the ongoing conceptual evolution of the perspective. For the purposes of this paper, however, the refinements proposed by sociologist Donileen Loseke are particularly pivotal.…”
Section: The Social Construction Of Social Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variant of social constructionism Spector is most inspired by is ‘contextual constructionism.’ Drawing from Spector and Kitsuse (1973), Spector refers to claims-making as ‘activities of groups making assertions of grievances and claims to organizations, agencies, and institutions about some putative conditions.’ A number of debates emerged during the 1980s and 1990s that Spector, in my view correctly, largely sidesteps (see Best, 2003; Ibarra and Kitsuse, 2003; Woolgar and Pawluch, 1985). In Chapter 4 he introduces ‘strict’ constructionism as a more ‘exacting’ variant of constructionism that ‘insist[s] that there is no such thing as an objective fact’ (p. 66).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Spector isn’t directly critical of strict constructionism, but clearly favors the ‘contextual’ alternative, which permits ‘judgment about the legitimacy of a claim’ (p. 76). It is also clear that he is highly persuaded by the reasoning behind ‘contextual constructionism’ as offered by the influential constructionist scholar Joel Best, both through Best’s published writings (Best, 1995, 2003) as well as personal correspondence (p. 77).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para una revisión de la discusión sobre construcción de problemas sociales, verBest (2003);Frigerio (1997); Lorenc (2005); Márquez (2011);Schillagi (2012); Scheneider (1985);Spector y John (1973;;Thompson (2001).…”
unclassified