2017
DOI: 10.1017/age.2016.40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buyer and Nonbuyer Barriers to Purchasing Local Food

Abstract: Policymakers and value chain members often use a one-size-fits-all strategy to increase local food consumption. Our results indicate this approach may not be effective; local food buyers and nonbuyers have differing barriers to purchasing more or accessing local food. We examine the effect of demographics, health indicators, shopping location, and zip code on those barriers. Prices and availability are barriers for both buyers and nonbuyers. Consumers with higher healthy diet scores are more likely to think ab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the most selected price classes were the lowest: 19.5% spent from E 1 (US$ 1.20) to E 10 (US$ 11.96), and 20.7% spent from E 11 (US$ 13.16) to E 20 (US$ 23.92). These results confirm the finding of Qi et al (2017) that the price of local products can represent a barrier to their purchase.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Second, the most selected price classes were the lowest: 19.5% spent from E 1 (US$ 1.20) to E 10 (US$ 11.96), and 20.7% spent from E 11 (US$ 13.16) to E 20 (US$ 23.92). These results confirm the finding of Qi et al (2017) that the price of local products can represent a barrier to their purchase.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…(3) Other issues that may limit the interpretation of the results are that an online survey may have under-coverage and self-selection bias problems [45]. Many papers that used an online survey have pointed out those issues [46][47][48]. Limited by some facts, for example, WeChat is not open source, and there is no specific sampling frame, we can only implement convenient sampling, which may lead to biased estimates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have highlighted consumer preference for local foods (Adalja et al 2015) and effective policies for better consumer access and proliferation of local foods (Qi et al 2017). For policy makers interested in promoting local foods, this study highlights the potential market impacts of new local brands and the associated increased competition.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%