2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3440768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buyer Beware: The Paradox of ESG & Passive ESG Funds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…expense ratio between 25 and 150 basis points which are slightly lower than in the studies (50 and 200 basis points). In fact, these expense ratios are in line with what Alda [122] and Brakman Reiser-Tucker [123] found typical nowadays for ESG ETFs. The expense-adjusted portfolio return is the ESG-themed megatrend return minus the sum of transaction costs.…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…expense ratio between 25 and 150 basis points which are slightly lower than in the studies (50 and 200 basis points). In fact, these expense ratios are in line with what Alda [122] and Brakman Reiser-Tucker [123] found typical nowadays for ESG ETFs. The expense-adjusted portfolio return is the ESG-themed megatrend return minus the sum of transaction costs.…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The impact of transaction costs is an essential consideration in assessing the profitability of trading strategies [121]; therefore, we analysed the ESG-themed megatrend portfolios after controlling for costs and fees. We concentrate on the expense ratio, as did two recent studies [122,123]. We follow the method of Derwall et al and Kemp-Osthoff [124,125] assuming an…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%