Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery &Amp; Data Mining 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3292500.3330670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buying or Browsing?: Predicting Real-time Purchasing Intent using Attention-based Deep Network with Multiple Behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prediction goals. Some models address the challenge of distinguishing between buying and non-buying sessions (B/NB, two possible prediction outcomes) [4], [7], [8], [29]- [35]. Alternatively, other works concentrate on calculating the probability that a customer buys either a specific product (B-Prod) [20], [36]- [38] or a class of products (B-CProd) [39], [40], makes a purchase in the next visit to the online store (Next) [41]- [43], or repurchases in a future session (ReP) [44], [45].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Prediction goals. Some models address the challenge of distinguishing between buying and non-buying sessions (B/NB, two possible prediction outcomes) [4], [7], [8], [29]- [35]. Alternatively, other works concentrate on calculating the probability that a customer buys either a specific product (B-Prod) [20], [36]- [38] or a class of products (B-CProd) [39], [40], makes a purchase in the next visit to the online store (Next) [41]- [43], or repurchases in a future session (ReP) [44], [45].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Table 1, the most common attributes are customers' personal (P) or demographic (D) data, product interest scores (PI), customers' navigation (NB) or purchasing behaviors (PB), or historical purchasing data (HP) (the RFM value or payments, for instance). Nevertheless, some proposals select alternative interesting attributes, such as the use of shopping carts (SC) [32], [43], seller's reputations and facilities (SRF) [45], customers' opinions (CO) [47], changes in user behavior (ChB) [46] or interactions of users with Web pages and their elements (Int) [7]. From a methodological point of view, two approaches should be emphasized.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the above models have disadvantages of weak feature representation ability and not high accuracy when used to process user's historical behavioral data which are quite complicated. Therefore, CNN and RNN-represented deep learning-based prediction models for user purchasing behaviors have been put forward in succession [4,17] . Song et al used user's historical purchasing behavioral data, predicted buyer purchasing time based on MLP and RNN models, respectively, and the results showed that MLP achieved better effect than RNN [18] .…”
Section: Individual Learning Prediction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%