2004
DOI: 10.1007/s11160-004-7121-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bycatch quotas in the Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl fishery: can they work?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, the interplay among competing users in the GOM (20) should be considered in evaluating collapses, e.g., commercial and recreational fishers as well as a trawl fishery for penaeid shrimp that captures many juveniles as bycatch (23). In addition, the Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission (www.gsmfc.org/) has encouraged member states to designate several species that once were fished commercially as game fish.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the interplay among competing users in the GOM (20) should be considered in evaluating collapses, e.g., commercial and recreational fishers as well as a trawl fishery for penaeid shrimp that captures many juveniles as bycatch (23). In addition, the Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission (www.gsmfc.org/) has encouraged member states to designate several species that once were fished commercially as game fish.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their distribution patterns, ecological roles, and status in bottom fisheries, with an emphasis on their relation with penaeid shrimps, are outlined in the "Appendix". These fish species were chosen because they ranked high in catches in the surveys as well as bycatch in the shrimp fishery (Diamond 2004). Both the junevile and adult individuals are well represented in the data (Monk et al 2015).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the exception of A. lineatus and L. parva, the remaining four species mentioned above are commercially important (Vega-Cendejas and Hernández, 2004). Thus, the selective removal of juvenile fish can increase the risks of recruitment overfishing, which could lead to the depletion of commercially important fish stocks exploited at open seas (Diamond, 2004;Vianna and Almeida, 2005) or cascading higher order effects at the community or ecosystem levels (Lewison et al, 2004). Taking into account that the MS13 codend retained a greater number of fish species and had a significantly greater effect on diversity and evenness (see Figs.…”
Section: Spatio-temporal Variability Of the Ichthyofauna: Effects Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poorly selective fishing practices impact negatively the productivity of fishing grounds (Hall, 1996;FAO, 2001), affecting directly the discarded species and also modifying the trophic webs and habitats (Harrington et al, 2005). Many studies have been directed to evaluate discards in industrial fisheries worldwide (Polet, 2000;Campos et al, 2002;Halliday, 2002;Madsen and Holst, 2002;Broadhurst et al, 2004;Diamond, 2004). However, discarding from artisanal fisheries is poorly known (for exceptions see Kelleher, 2005;Ambrose et al, 2005;Vianna and D'Incao, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%