2013 IEEE Information Theory Workshop (ITW) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/itw.2013.6691322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bypassing correlation decay for matchings with an application to XORSAT

Abstract: Many combinatorial optimization problems on sparse graphs do not exhibit the correlation decay property. In such cases, the cavity method remains a sophisticated heuristic with no rigorous proof. In this paper, we consider the maximum matching problem which is one of the simplest such example. We show that monotonicity properties of the problem allows us to define solutions for the cavity equations. More importantly, we are able to identify the 'right' solution of these equations and then to compute the asympt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the upper bound on the rank follows from [30], (2.11) implies that rk(A n )/n converges to 1 − max α∈[0,1] Φ(α) in probability, as claimed.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Since the upper bound on the rank follows from [30], (2.11) implies that rk(A n )/n converges to 1 − max α∈[0,1] Φ(α) in probability, as claimed.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Since adding or removing a single row can only change the rank by one, Azuma's inequality shows that it suffices to compute E[rk(A n )]. In fact, since the upper bound on the rank already follows from [30], we merely need to bound E[rk(A n )] from below, or equivalently bound E[nul(A n )] from above. We are thus tempted to write…”
Section: Proof Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to the N P -hardness of calculating ln Z in general, as discussed earlier, this can of course only be true for very specific instances of random CSPs (if we suppose P = N P ). Indeed, it turns out that the Bethe approximation by Belief Propagation, which we will call the procedure above, yields the correct value of the partition function sometimes [50,52,145] and sometimes it does not [126]. The latter is assumed to happen, if the system's solution space had undergone a phase transition at which replica symmetry breaking occurred.…”
Section: Boltzmann Marginals and The Partition Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%