2020
DOI: 10.5093/jwop2020a11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bystander Intervention in the Context of Abusive Supervision: Effects of Power Distance Orientation and Gender

Abstract: This study focused on the perceptions and reactions of observers in abusive supervision situations, with regard to the premises of the Bystander Intervention Framework. A 2 x 2 x 2 design was used based on observer's, perpetrator's, and victim's gender. Several vignettes for four different perpetrator-victim dyads (e.g., female perpetrator-male victim) were developed. Participants (N = 197) read these vignettes consecutively over five days and finally were asked to evaluate the perceived acceptability of the a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding coping strategies, we do not observe any significant relationship between emotional coping and burnout dimensions, but we confirm that coping results may be different depending on gender (Arman, 2020). Behavioural coping appears negatively related to depersonalization, confirming only partially hypothesis 2, since this relation is only observed in men.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding coping strategies, we do not observe any significant relationship between emotional coping and burnout dimensions, but we confirm that coping results may be different depending on gender (Arman, 2020). Behavioural coping appears negatively related to depersonalization, confirming only partially hypothesis 2, since this relation is only observed in men.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…One of the most important mediating variables is coping strategies, since men and women have different ways of interpreting and responding to social demands (Arman, 2020), which can be explained by the influence of gender roles (Eagly & Wood, 2012;Lyu & Fan, 2020). Although the relationship between gender and workfamily conflict has been extensively studied, relatively little is known about whether gender shapes the relationship between work-family conflict, coping strategies, and burnout.…”
Section: Palabras Clavementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, power dynamics play a central role in understanding supervisor–graduate relationships, as power distance orientation influences how graduate students perceive, evaluate, and react to abusive supervisory behaviours [ 12 ]. Meanwhile, abusive supervision decreased help-seeking behaviour and the willingness to provide direct or indirect help [ 66 ], reducing an individual's sense of connection. Therefore, we call for more research to discover the influence of cultural factors and to examine the differential effects of individual-level factors (e.g., power-distance orientation) and population-level factors (e.g., individualism-collectivism).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of simply offering emotional support or ruminating together with the abused subordinates, coworkers can offer more constructively supportive help. For example, based on the premise of the bystander intervention framework, Arman (2020) stated that coworkers could inform someone from management about the behaviors of the supervisor towards the abused subordinates, and encourage the abused subordinates to talk to someone from management. Further, organizations can also set up practical access (i.e., anonymous open mailbox) for subordinates to reflect anonymously on their situation of experiencing abusive supervision, train the abused subordinates to sometimes neglect supervisors’ aggression to protect their own mental health, and provide subordinates with effective up-management skills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%