2017
DOI: 10.1101/146514
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bystro: rapid online variant annotation and natural-language filtering at whole-genome scale

Abstract: 21Accurately selecting relevant alleles in large sequencing experiments remains

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All biallelic variants with a genotyping rate of 90% or greater, regardless of MAF, were investigated within each region of interest (defined as 1Mb centered on each lead variant). Each interval was annotated for possible roles in craniofacial development by literature searches of all genes contained within that interval, functional annotation of variants using multiple tools including Bystro (39), Variant Effect Predictor (40), and HaploReg (41). We also queried the UCSC genome browser’s gene-by-gene interaction track for known OFC genes/regions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All biallelic variants with a genotyping rate of 90% or greater, regardless of MAF, were investigated within each region of interest (defined as 1Mb centered on each lead variant). Each interval was annotated for possible roles in craniofacial development by literature searches of all genes contained within that interval, functional annotation of variants using multiple tools including Bystro (39), Variant Effect Predictor (40), and HaploReg (41). We also queried the UCSC genome browser’s gene-by-gene interaction track for known OFC genes/regions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(28) These unique variants were functionally annotated using Bystro (https://bystro.io/) and ANNOVAR, which report the variant's type, functional classification (nonsense, replacement, silent, 5′ or 3′ untranslated region, splice junction, or other intronic, intergenic), presence in the Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Database, and measures of evolutionary conservation. (29,30) To explore the potential contribution of ciliary dysgenesis and/or dysfunction underlying the BASM phenotype, we used a prespecified list of 2,016 genes of interest (GOI; Supporting Table S1) derived principally from two large comprehensive data sets dedicated to ciliomic studies as well as the Emory Genetics Laboratory Ciliopathies Sequencing Panel and Neonatal and Adult Cholestasis Sequencing Panel and a collated list of putative BA candidate susceptibility genes reported in the literature (18,23,27,31) (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Wes and Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Annotation of the multi-sample VCF (n=1,196) was performed using Bystro (19) and supplemented by the Broad's ChromHMM annotation of dPFC tissue (20,21). A total of 1,133 samples passed all quality control measures and 63 samples were excluded for one or more of the following reasons.…”
Section: Genetic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%