2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00526-015-0948-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

$$C^{2,\alpha }$$ C 2 , α regularities and estimates for nonlinear elliptic and parabolic equations in geometry

Abstract: We give sharp C 2,α estimates for solutions of some fully nonlinear elliptic and parabolic equations in complex geometry and almost complex geometry, assuming a bound on the Laplacian of the solution. We also prove the analogous results to complex Monge-Ampère equations with conical singularities. As an application, we obtain a local estimate for Calabi-Yau equation in almost complex geometry. We also improve the C 2,α regularities and estimates for viscosity solutions to some uniformly elliptic and parabolic … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then E is a compact convex subset of Sym(4n, R). We observe that Φ and p satisfy the assumptions in [7,Theorem 5.1]. Indeed, This together with n r=1 u rr ≤ C gives a uniform lower bound for each u rr .…”
Section: Proof Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then E is a compact convex subset of Sym(4n, R). We observe that Φ and p satisfy the assumptions in [7,Theorem 5.1]. Indeed, This together with n r=1 u rr ≤ C gives a uniform lower bound for each u rr .…”
Section: Proof Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Step 4. A general result in [7] implies a uniform Hölder estimate on the second derivatives of ϕ, thus a classical bootstrapping argument using Schauder estimates implies T = ∞ and a uniform bound on |∇ k ϕ| for k ≥ 1 (Lemmas 8 and 9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof of Theorem 1.2. Thanks to Propositions 3.1 and 5.1, we can obtain a priori C 2,α estimates from the main result of [44], for some 0 < α < 1 (and in fact for all 0 < α < 1 by [10]). Higher order estimates follow after differentiating the equation and applying the usual bootstrapping method.…”
Section: Completion Of the Proofs Of The Main Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In the foliated local coordinate patch (U ; x 1 , · · · , x r , z 1 , · · · , z n ), we work with the qualities of (z 1 , · · · , z n ). Therefore, given (7.8), (7.18) and (7.19), the C 2,α estimate (7.20) follows from the Evans-Krylov theory (see [64,15]) and high order estimate (7.21) follows from the bootstrapping argument.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%