2018
DOI: 10.2140/gt.2018.22.3671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

C∗–algebraic higher signatures and an invariance theorem in codimension two

Abstract: We revisit the construction of signature classes in C * -algebra K-theory, and develop a variation that allows us to prove equality of signature classes in some situations involving homotopy equivalences of noncompact manifolds that are only defined outside of a compact set. As an application, we prove a counterpart for signature classes of a codimension two vanishing theorem for the index of the Dirac operator on spin manifolds (the latter is due to Hanke, Pape and Schick, and is a development of well-known w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this note, we give an account of the proof in [6], together with a slight simplification avoiding relative higher index theory. Moreover, we observe that this method also gives a simpler proof of the main result of [5], even of the following strengthening. Here we write Sgn(M ; V M ) for the C * -algebraic higher signatures, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this note, we give an account of the proof in [6], together with a slight simplification avoiding relative higher index theory. Moreover, we observe that this method also gives a simpler proof of the main result of [5], even of the following strengthening. Here we write Sgn(M ; V M ) for the C * -algebraic higher signatures, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Higson, Schick, and Xie proved in [5] a companion result: the unexpected homotopy invariance of higher signatures of submanifolds of codimension 2 in the situation of Theorem 1.1, with the spin condition replaced by orientability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to [HPS15, Theorem 1.1], if M and N satisfies some assumptions on homotopy groups (listed in Proposition 2.8), and if the Rosenberg index α π (N ) vanishes, then M does not admit any psc metric. The corresponding result in higher signature is established by Higson-Schick-Xie [HSX18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%