2018
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-4-491-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

C-Aqm: A Crowd-Sourced Air Quality Monitoring System

Abstract: <p><strong>Abstract.</strong> European cities are currently facing one of the main evolutions of the last fifty years. “Cities for the citizens” is the new leitmotiv of modern societies, and citizens are demanding, among others, a greener environment including non-polluted air. Improved sensors and improved communication systems open the door to the design of new systems based on citizen science to better monitor the air quality. In this paper, we present a system that relies on the already a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, as it can be observed in Figure 5, the NO2 measurements are rather noisy, with a standard deviation of around 7 µg/m 3 , mainly due to a large quantification error of the NO2 sensor. As it can be observed in Figure 5, by applying a moving average filter of 1 hour and a correction of a constant bias on the measurements provided the NO2 sensor of the AirCrowd sensor node, the results achieved fulfill the precision and accuracy requirements (better than 25%) defined in (Parés, Vázquez-Gallego, 2018). 3.4 Air quality measurements system performance: Calibration procedure evaluation.…”
Section: Communications Subsystemmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, as it can be observed in Figure 5, the NO2 measurements are rather noisy, with a standard deviation of around 7 µg/m 3 , mainly due to a large quantification error of the NO2 sensor. As it can be observed in Figure 5, by applying a moving average filter of 1 hour and a correction of a constant bias on the measurements provided the NO2 sensor of the AirCrowd sensor node, the results achieved fulfill the precision and accuracy requirements (better than 25%) defined in (Parés, Vázquez-Gallego, 2018). 3.4 Air quality measurements system performance: Calibration procedure evaluation.…”
Section: Communications Subsystemmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Then, an office operator can download the data from the database, correct the geo-referenciation, calibrate the system and finally generate the results. The functionalities of each subsystem are described in detail in (Parés, Vázquez-Gallego, 2018). Hereafter, a brief description is done.…”
Section: System Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations