2005
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4812652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

C-Arm for accurate reduction of zygomatic arch fracture — A case report

Abstract: Fracture of the zygomatic arch is usually treated using blind methods. As the fracture lines cannot be visualised directly in closed reduction, digital exploration and crepitus noise or conventional radiographic imaging are used clinically as a guide to reposition the fragments. Successful closed reductions are often difficult to evaluate clinically because of the great amount of swelling that often accompanies these fractures. Postoperative radiographs are often the only way to assess the adequacy of the redu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 This system also involves little or no additional cost because of its wide availability in trauma centers and does not necessarily require operation by a radiologic technologist. 12,21 Mini portable fluoroscopy 8,22 offers more mobility and a lower risk of radiation exposure than the C-arm 23 but is less widely available 12 and likely unable to provide a bilateral zygomatic view.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…11 This system also involves little or no additional cost because of its wide availability in trauma centers and does not necessarily require operation by a radiologic technologist. 12,21 Mini portable fluoroscopy 8,22 offers more mobility and a lower risk of radiation exposure than the C-arm 23 but is less widely available 12 and likely unable to provide a bilateral zygomatic view.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The C-arm technique used was closely similar to that previously reported by Badjate and Cariappa. 11 Irradiation was directed from the submental area to the vertex toward the affected arch tangentially, allowing the zygomatic frame to be clearly viewed. The infraorbital rim, zygomaticofrontal suture, and zygomaticomaxillary buttresses were exposed via subciliary or subtarsal, lateral eyebrow, and gingivobuccal sulcus incisions, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even after complete eruption, they present correctly. Badjate and Cariappa [17] point to the possibility of concrescence that may complicate endodontic, orthodontic, prosthetic and surgical treatment. Partial diagnosis and not informing the patient about this anomaly prior to a surgical procedure may even have legal repercussions [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Badjate and Cariappa [17] point to the possibility of concrescence that may complicate endodontic, orthodontic, prosthetic and surgical treatment. Partial diagnosis and not informing the patient about this anomaly prior to a surgical procedure may even have legal repercussions [17]. The presence of an impacted tooth on an orthopantomographic image alone, does not, in many cases, cause suspicion of concrescence with the neighboring tooth [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%