C/C++

Abstract

This chapter attempts to describe the C and C++ programming languages in general and also how they apply to developing software for Internet applications. The reader will be taken through a brief history of the languages, as well as its most common strengths and weaknesses. Although the scope of the two languages makes it impossible to cover them completely in this context, the languages are discussed in sufficient detail so that, with the proper tools, the reader can develop and test simple C or C++ programs. Working example programs are included. Finally, attention is given to how the language is used to develop Internet applications, and how it competes with other languages such as Java and common scripting languages such as Perl and PHP.

D- A Powerful General Purpose Application Programming Language

“…It can depend upon the worksatiation which the stakeholder will use for analyzing the time with different languages. Table [3][4][5] shows the comparison of execution time in different languages using same program logic i.e. loop implementation (for, while and do-while).…”

Humanization of critical care—psychological effects on healthcare professionals and relatives: a systematic review

“…Only two were randomized-controlled studies, 82,83 five were pre-and post-intervention cohort studies, [84][85][86][87][88] four were prospective cohort studies with nonrandomized controls, [89][90][91][92] and one was a retrospective study. 93 Four discrete humanizing interventions were assessed: diaries, 83,84 liberalization of visitation, [87][88][89] witnessed resuscitation, 82,92,93 and family participation in basic care. 85,90,91 One study of a mixed intervention with both humanizing and non-humanizing initiatives was included on the basis that some of the interventions tested had potential to increase physical and emotional proximity to the patient (liberal visitation and family involvement in basic care).…”

“…86 Ten studies measured anxiety among a total of 1,055 family members. [82][83][84][85][88][89][90][91][92][93] Two studies measured burnout among a total of 288 critical care professionals 86,87 No studies addressed empathy or compassion fatigue. Two studies of witnessed resuscitation sought unspecified adverse psychologic effects among relatives and reported none.…”

“…Eleven of the 12 included studies had an overall high risk of bias. [83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93] Details of risk of bias assessment for each study are provided (Table 3) ( Fig. 2).…”

“…For the ten included cohort studies, none achieved a highquality rating; five studies received a score of 5,84,85,87,90,93 putting them at the lower end of a moderate rating, and five had a low quality rating 86,88,89,91,92 (Table 4).…”