“…Such dimerization reactions (let alone equilibria) are as of yet unknown for the lightest group 13 analogues, dicoordinate borylenes, and their formal diborene dimers, which, unlike their heavier group 13 analogues, are planar. Following Bertrand’s and Robinson’s landmark syntheses of the first metal-free borylene and diborene, respectively, , the past decade has seen a surge in the reports of doubly base-stabilized tricoordinate LL′(R)B: borylenes and L(R)BB(R)L diborenes. − Stable L(R)B: dicoordinate borylenes, however, remain limited to a few examples stabilized by the push–pull interaction of a π-donating amino substituent and a π-accepting carbene ligand ( I , Scheme a). − Due to the linear geometry, steric shielding, and electronic saturation of their boron center, these species do not dimerize to the corresponding diaminodiborenes. Thus far, attempts to generate dicoordinate borylenes in situ by the photolytic or thermal abstraction of a labile donor ligand (e.g., CO, PMe 3 ) from a tricoordinate borylene have systematically led to intramolecular C–H or C–C activation reactions rather than dimerization. − Experimental and computational studies on the only known formal borylene-diborene L(R)B:/L(R)BB(R)L pair, tetrameric cyanoborylene I and cyanodiborene II (Scheme a), showed that these two species do not interconvert owing to the preferred self-stabilization of I through B–CN–B linkages. , The fact, however, that certain LBRX 2 (X = halide) precursors can be reduced either to a tricoordinate borylene (or borylene equivalent) in the presence of a second base L′ or to a diborene in the absence thereof suggests the feasibility of borylene-to-diborene dimerization.…”