2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.diff.2010.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

C/EBPα and PU.1 are involved in distinct differentiation responses of acute promyelocytic leukemia HL-60 and NB4 cells via chromatin remodeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5a). Importantly, the delayed differentiation effect in NB4 cells by belinostat is consistent with our previous reports, using different HDAC inhibitors, such as sodium butyrate, FK228, and BML-210 [39][40][41]. Moreover, this occurs in association with the downregulation of cyclin E1 and upregulation of p27 [38].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…5a). Importantly, the delayed differentiation effect in NB4 cells by belinostat is consistent with our previous reports, using different HDAC inhibitors, such as sodium butyrate, FK228, and BML-210 [39][40][41]. Moreover, this occurs in association with the downregulation of cyclin E1 and upregulation of p27 [38].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We believe that this may instead result from the ability of PU.1 or C/EBPα to induce different sets of genes, besides a common set of genes, during osteoclastogenesis. Our notion is underscored by a recent study demonstrating that C/EBPα and PU.1 exhibit distinct responses in the human acute leukemia HL-60 and NB4 cell lines (55). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…However, in the other promyelocytic cell line NB4, SLC11A1 is not prone to transcriptional activation. Epigenetic differences between HL-60 and NB4 cells alter their response to VitD, which induces differentiation by genomic (VDR) or non-genomic mechanisms, respectively, [95,187,193]. Studying SLC11A1 locus can thus help evidence molecular aberrations that occur in myelo-monocytic leukemia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differential pharmacological modulation of histone modifications have previously been reported with NB4 and HL-60 cell lines; such as H4 acetylation in the G-CSF receptor promoter at the C/EBPα binding site in HL-60 but not in NB4 cells [187]. Interactions detected in HL-60 cells between SLC11A1 putative 5' enhancer and RNA Pol II, GABP and PU.1 (Figure 3F) indicate the possibility that the relevant elements are active in these cells whereas they are not in NB4 and K-562 cells.…”
Section: Patterns Of Histone Marks and Transcription Factor Bindinmentioning
confidence: 99%