2019
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci9110320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

C-Fiber Assays in the Cornea vs. Skin

Abstract: C-fibers are unmyelinated nerve fibers that transmit high threshold mechanical, thermal, and chemical signals that are associated with pain sensations. This review examines current literature on measuring altered peripheral nerve morphology and discusses the most relevant aspects of corneal microscopy, especially whether corneal imaging presents significant method advantages over skin biopsy. Given its relative merits, corneal confocal microscopy would seem to be a more practical and patient-centric approach t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The greater corneal nerve loss in patients with DPN compared with those without DPN is consistent with studies showing that corneal nerve loss is associated with the severity of DPN 4,24,51,57,58 and has good sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing DPN [5][6][7] . Both CNFD and IENFD have a comparable diagnostic performance for DPN 8,9,59 , although in a study of patients with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes there were differences in the extent of small nerve fiber damage between CCM and skin biopsy 57 . Additionally, a reduction in corneal nerve parameters is associated with incident DPN 10,53,60 and greater corneal nerve loss 41 , and augmented nerve branching 27 occurs in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The greater corneal nerve loss in patients with DPN compared with those without DPN is consistent with studies showing that corneal nerve loss is associated with the severity of DPN 4,24,51,57,58 and has good sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing DPN [5][6][7] . Both CNFD and IENFD have a comparable diagnostic performance for DPN 8,9,59 , although in a study of patients with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes there were differences in the extent of small nerve fiber damage between CCM and skin biopsy 57 . Additionally, a reduction in corneal nerve parameters is associated with incident DPN 10,53,60 and greater corneal nerve loss 41 , and augmented nerve branching 27 occurs in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Five main etiological processes underlie SFN ( Table 1 ) [ 15 , 16 ], although approximately 40% of cases remain idiopathic [ 15 , 16 , 17 ]. Previously, it was considered that most cases of SFN were associated with diabetes mellitus type 1 and 2.…”
Section: Etiology and Manifestations Of Small Fiber Neuropathymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CCM is gaining acceptance in the diagnosis of small fiber neuropathy ( Figure 2 ) [ 36 ]. Earlier studies of patients with idiopathic SFN demonstrated decreased corneal nerve fiber density and increased tortuosity [ 29 , 36 ] with increased dendritic cells, indicating systemic inflammation [ 15 ]. In a recent deep phenotyping study of patients with idiopathic SFN, whilst abnormalities occurred in the distal intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) (60/86, 70%) and neurological examination (53/86, 62%) most frequently reflected small fiber disease, adding CCM and/or pain-related evoked potentials (PREP) further increased the identification of patients with small fiber impairment to 47/55 (85%), whilst quantitative sensory testing (QST), quantitative sudomotor reflex testing (QSART), and proximal IENFD were of lower impact [ 15 , 37 ].…”
Section: Corneal Confocal Microscopy In Small Fiber Neuropathymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It provides various morphometric parameters to quantify corneal nociceptors and their changes over time. Use of this tool is limited in that it requires specific equipment and a trained technician that are often unavailable, thus it is primarily used in research at this time [ 6 , 26 , 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Sfnmentioning
confidence: 99%