2023
DOI: 10.1039/d2dt03984b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

C–H activation in bimetallic rhodium complexes to afford N-heterocyclic carbene pincer complexes

Abstract: The pro-ligands 1,8-bis(di-R-phosphinomethyl)-2,3-dihydroperimidine (RH2Pm, R = phenyl, cyclohexyl) react with [RhCl(CE)(PPh3)2] (E = O, S) to afford the bimetallic complexes [RhCl(CE)(-RH2Pm)]2 (E = O, S). Upon heating, these species undergo...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 94 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of known bimetallic Rh(I) complexes consist of a ligand with two distinct binding sites connected by a linker moiety, where the size and nature of the linker determines the proximity and the extent of electronic communication between the two Rh(I) centres. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] With a view on cooperative effects it is thus useful to distinguish between linked bimetallics (two monometallic complexes tethered together) and twinned bimetallics where the two metals are held closely enough for direct metal-metal interactions to exist. 20,21 This distinction is not purely a function of atomic distances but depends on orbital overlap and is thus a sliding scale akin to the Robin-Day classification, 22,23 where the extremes of a truly twinned bimetallic would be class III and a distantly linked bimetallic class I.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of known bimetallic Rh(I) complexes consist of a ligand with two distinct binding sites connected by a linker moiety, where the size and nature of the linker determines the proximity and the extent of electronic communication between the two Rh(I) centres. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] With a view on cooperative effects it is thus useful to distinguish between linked bimetallics (two monometallic complexes tethered together) and twinned bimetallics where the two metals are held closely enough for direct metal-metal interactions to exist. 20,21 This distinction is not purely a function of atomic distances but depends on orbital overlap and is thus a sliding scale akin to the Robin-Day classification, 22,23 where the extremes of a truly twinned bimetallic would be class III and a distantly linked bimetallic class I.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%