“…As apparent by EPR spectroscopy,amixture of two Ni III CF 3 complexes, 2 and 2·Py (see below), was obtained when 1equiv of XeF 2 was used (see Figure 1b). [14] These Ni III dimers are diamagnetic (singlet spin state) or paramagnetic (triplet spin state) depending on the magnitude of the antiferromagnetic coupling between the two Ni III centers.D FT calculations fully support 2 to be paramagnetic as the triplet dimer was calculated to be 43.5 kcal mol À1 lower in energy than the corresponding singlet, which is in agreement with the fact that complex 2 is NMR-silent but seen by EPR spectroscopy.T herefore,t he bridging fluoride ligands do not favor antiferromagnetic coupling between the two Ni III centers in 2.T he frozen-solution EPR spectrum (Figure 1b [20] Thermal ellipsoids set at 50 %probability.b)EPR spectrum (blue line) for the mixture of 2 and 2·Py in 3:1PrCN/DCBat1 20 Kand the spectrum (red line) simulated using the following parameters: 2: g x = 2.237, g y = 2.172, g z = 2.018 (A N = 18.4 G, A F = 220 G); 2·Py: g x = 2.232, g y = 2.166, g z = 2.018 (A 2N = 19.6 G). XRD analysis showed that complex 2 crystallizes as adimer with two distinct Ni centers, which are linked by two bridging fluoride ligands.I nterestingly,t he coordination environment around each Ni unit is different, resulting in ahighly unusual, unsymmetric structure for 2.O ne of the Ni centers exhibits an octahedral environment, whereas the second one is in as quare-pyramidal environment.…”