2016
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-12-686147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

c-Myb acts in parallel and cooperatively with Cebp1 to regulate neutrophil maturation in zebrafish

Abstract: Key Points c-Myb is essential for neutrophil terminal differentiation by targeting granule gene expression. c-Myb and Cebp1 act cooperatively to regulate neutrophil maturation in zebrafish.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In human neutrophils, transcriptional and epigenetic analyses have revealed several TFs that are differentially expressed in the comparisons between different differentiation stages . Preneutrophils and immature neutrophils express high levels of C/EBPα, C/EBPɛ, Gfi1, and Klf5, which have been shown to function to promote the granulocytic lineage choice, and several other TFs like Erg, Myb, which have implicated to associate with neutrophil terminal maturation . Moreoever, TFs like Fosl1, Fosl2, Junb, Bcl6, Klf6, and Irf1 are constitutively expressed across differentiation stages and tend to reach the maximal expression in terminally differentiated neutrophils .…”
Section: Granulocytopoiesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In human neutrophils, transcriptional and epigenetic analyses have revealed several TFs that are differentially expressed in the comparisons between different differentiation stages . Preneutrophils and immature neutrophils express high levels of C/EBPα, C/EBPɛ, Gfi1, and Klf5, which have been shown to function to promote the granulocytic lineage choice, and several other TFs like Erg, Myb, which have implicated to associate with neutrophil terminal maturation . Moreoever, TFs like Fosl1, Fosl2, Junb, Bcl6, Klf6, and Irf1 are constitutively expressed across differentiation stages and tend to reach the maximal expression in terminally differentiated neutrophils .…”
Section: Granulocytopoiesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 Preneutrophils and immature neutrophils express high levels of C/EBP , C/EBPɛ, Gfi1, and Klf5, which have been shown to function to promote the granulocytic lineage choice, 11,15,29,49 and several other TFs like Erg, Myb, which have implicated to associate with neutrophil terminal maturation. 50,51 Moreoever, TFs like Fosl1, Fosl2, Junb, Bcl6, Klf6, and Irf1 are constitutively expressed across differentiation stages and tend to reach the maximal expression in terminally differentiated neutrophils. 48 Many of these TFs are zinc-finger proteins or leucine zipper motif-containing factors that play roles during inflammatory and oxidative stress responses.…”
Section: Terminal Differentiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These phosphorylated amino acids serve as docking sites to recruit signalling molecules that regulate intracellular signalling networks, such as those mediated by MAPK, PKC and Akt; therefore, EGF is involved in the regulation of various biological functions (Li et al., ). c‐myb, belonged to Myb family, is a transcription factor responsible for controlling expression of a wide array of genes implicated in multiple physiological and pathological processes, like transactivation of cytosolic alanine aminotransferase, differentiation of colon epithelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells, neutrophil maturation, autophagy and tumorigenesis (Ramsay et al., ; Anemaet et al., ; Lee et al., ; Li et al., ; Jin et al., ; Shikatani et al., ). As transcription factor binding to gene promoter is a major approach to regulate the gene transcription, it is easy to understand that EGF regulating the binding of c‐myb to NaPi‐IIb gene promoter can influence its expression in human intestinal cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synthesis of digoxigenin-labelled antisense RNA probes and whole mount in situ hybridization were performed as described previously (Jin et al, 2016;Liu et al, 2017). The probes were listed as follows: rag1, myb, lck, ikaros, foxn1, pu.1, lyz, mfap4, gata1 and βe1.…”
Section: Whole-mount In Situ Hybridizationmentioning
confidence: 99%