2007
DOI: 10.4161/cc.6.3.3808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

c-MYC Delays Prometaphase by Direct Transactivation of MAD2 and BubR1: Identification of Mechanisms Underlying c-MYC-Induced DNA Damage and Chromosomal Instability

Abstract: Here we show that the human BubR1 and MAD2 genes, which encode inhibitors of the anaphase promoting complex (APC/C), are directly activated by the oncogenic transcription factor c-MYC via E-box sequences in their first introns. In colorectal cancer biopsies elevated expression of c-MYC correlated with increased MAD2 levels. Activation of a conditional c-MYC allele delayed progression through mitosis in pro-metaphase in a MAD2- and BubR1-dependent manner. A fraction of the daughter cells derived from extended m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
76
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
76
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Independent of this, DSBs may produce dysmorphic nuclei, micronuclei and chromosomal bridging ( Figure 5; Supplementary Figure 2). Chromosomal bridging in fission yeast is a consequence of compromised kinetochore function (Ekwall et al, 1999) whereas in mammalian cells, it may arise from telomere defects, abnormalities in DNA replication and/or recombination, translocations associated with bi-centromeric chromosomes or overexpression of mitotic checkpoint genes (Harley and Villeponteau, 1995;Menssen et al, 2007;Sotillo et al, 2007). Chromosomal bridging has also been implicated in the creation of micronuclei similar to those reported here ( Figure 5; Saunders et al, 2000) and leads to other structural and numerical abnormalities (Saunders, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Independent of this, DSBs may produce dysmorphic nuclei, micronuclei and chromosomal bridging ( Figure 5; Supplementary Figure 2). Chromosomal bridging in fission yeast is a consequence of compromised kinetochore function (Ekwall et al, 1999) whereas in mammalian cells, it may arise from telomere defects, abnormalities in DNA replication and/or recombination, translocations associated with bi-centromeric chromosomes or overexpression of mitotic checkpoint genes (Harley and Villeponteau, 1995;Menssen et al, 2007;Sotillo et al, 2007). Chromosomal bridging has also been implicated in the creation of micronuclei similar to those reported here ( Figure 5; Saunders et al, 2000) and leads to other structural and numerical abnormalities (Saunders, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Cell lysis and immunoblotting were done as described in ref. 36. For immunodetection, membranes were incubated with antibodies specific for Cul7 (mouse hybridoma clone SA12 (37), p53 (DO-1; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), p21 (Ab-11; NeoMarkers, Fremont, CA), HA (clone HA.11; Covance, Princeton, NJ), Flag (M2, F-3165; Sigma), P-Chk2 (Thr-68, sc-16297-R; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), ␣-tubulin (clone DM1A; Sigma), or ␤-actin (A-2066; Sigma).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent report 44 has highlighted a potentially important relationship between c-Myc, CIN, and the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC). The latter is a signaling pathway that oversees the proper alignment of sister chromatids on the metaphase plate and their attachment to the bipolar mitotic spindle.…”
Section: Mechanistic Underpinnings Of C-myc Mediated Gimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45,46 It now turns out that two integral components of this checkpoint, namely Mad2 and BubR1, are direct c-Myc targets. 44 Both Mad2 and BubR1 are . This leads to two basic types of DNA damage: point mutations resulting from oxidized bases, and both single-stranded and double-stranded DNA breaks.…”
Section: Mechanistic Underpinnings Of C-myc Mediated Gimentioning
confidence: 99%