2002
DOI: 10.1101/gad.1024602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

c-Myc is essential for vasculogenesis and angiogenesis during development and tumor progression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
390
5
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 443 publications
(413 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
17
390
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interference with hypoxia-responsive differentiation may be widely involved in leukemia initiation and progression. For example, it is postulated that CMYC and HIF1 share common target genes (Dang and Semenza, 1999) and VEGF was recently presented as an indirect CMYC target gene (Baudino et al, 2002). Whether CMYC and hypoxia common target genes play a role in leukemogenesis remains to be determined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interference with hypoxia-responsive differentiation may be widely involved in leukemia initiation and progression. For example, it is postulated that CMYC and HIF1 share common target genes (Dang and Semenza, 1999) and VEGF was recently presented as an indirect CMYC target gene (Baudino et al, 2002). Whether CMYC and hypoxia common target genes play a role in leukemogenesis remains to be determined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 MYC has a crucial role in growth control, differentiation and apoptosis, and its aberrant expression is associated with several cancers. More recently, MYC was also implicated as having a major contribution in tumor angiogenesis, 33,34 by upregulating one of its direct targets, the miR-17-92 cluster. The predicted targets of miR-17-92 cluster are thrombospondin-1 (THBS1), encoding a potent endogenous inhibitor of angiogenesis, and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), encoding an extracellular matrix-associated molecule involved in angiogenesis and metastatic progression.…”
Section: Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, numerous studies showed that Myc activation was sufficient to provoke diverse cancers (Adams et al, 1985;Leder et al, 1986) and, more recently, that Myc is continuously required to maintain the transformed state (Felsher and Bishop, 1999;Pelengaris et al, 1999;Jain et al, 2002). Finally, to round out the story was the revelation that c-Myc functioned as an angiogenic switch (Pelengaris et al, 1999(Pelengaris et al, , 2002, and that its expression was in fact essential for proper and coordinate regulation of angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors in cancer and development (Baudino et al, 2002). This was satisfying -now we know why Myc activation was so pervasive in cancer.…”
Section: The Myc Paradoxmentioning
confidence: 99%