2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2010.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

C-PSA: Constrained Pareto simulated annealing for constrained multi-objective optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
12
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[4,34,36]). In the following, NO k and ND k will denote the best front obtained by NOSGA-II and NSGA-II, respectively, for the k-th instance.…”
Section: An Illustrative Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4,34,36]). In the following, NO k and ND k will denote the best front obtained by NOSGA-II and NSGA-II, respectively, for the k-th instance.…”
Section: An Illustrative Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jue Wang multi-objective optimization algorithms which are the most representative and best optimized such as C-PSA [2], MOABC [3] and CMOPSO [4] on the accepted test functions TNK, SRN, CONSTR and OSY [4]. The initial population size of AW-CMOA and the other 3 algorithms are set as 100.…”
Section: Constrained Multi-objective Optimization Algorithm Based On mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum size to which the archive may be filled before clustering is used to reduce its size to HL For more details about AMOSA, one can refer to Bandyopadhyay et al (2008) and Singh et al (2010).…”
Section: Slmentioning
confidence: 99%