Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Background Enfortumab vedotin (EV) has been approved for the treatment of patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) who previously received platinum-based chemotherapy followed by immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, the pivotal clinical trials did not include patients previously treated with avelumab maintenance therapy. Objective The aim of the present retrospective analysis was to assess the effectiveness of EV following avelumab in patients with mUC enrolled in the ARON-2 EV study. Patients and Methods The study included 182 patients with mUC treated with EV following avelumab maintenance. The primary objective was to assess clinical outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DoR). Statistical analysis involved Fisher exact test, Kaplan–Meier method, log-rank test, and univariate/multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models. Results Median OS and PFS were 12.7 (95% CI 10.2–14.1) and 7.9 (95% CI 6.4–9.9) months, respectively. Complete response (CR) was achieved in 5% and partial response (PR) in 34% of patients, with an ORR of 39%. The DoR in patients who achieved CR/PR was 10.9 months (95% CI 8.1–11.4). The incidence of grade ≥ 3 peripheral neuropathy and skin rash was 9%, followed by 8% of grade ≥ 3 diarrhea and 4% of grade ≥ 3 hyperglycemia. Conclusions The results of our large international retrospective study confirm the effectiveness of EV and endorse its use in the population of patients with mUC treated with EV following the frontline platinum-based chemotherapy and subsequent maintenance treatment with avelumab. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11523-024-01099-0.
Background Enfortumab vedotin (EV) has been approved for the treatment of patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) who previously received platinum-based chemotherapy followed by immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, the pivotal clinical trials did not include patients previously treated with avelumab maintenance therapy. Objective The aim of the present retrospective analysis was to assess the effectiveness of EV following avelumab in patients with mUC enrolled in the ARON-2 EV study. Patients and Methods The study included 182 patients with mUC treated with EV following avelumab maintenance. The primary objective was to assess clinical outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DoR). Statistical analysis involved Fisher exact test, Kaplan–Meier method, log-rank test, and univariate/multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models. Results Median OS and PFS were 12.7 (95% CI 10.2–14.1) and 7.9 (95% CI 6.4–9.9) months, respectively. Complete response (CR) was achieved in 5% and partial response (PR) in 34% of patients, with an ORR of 39%. The DoR in patients who achieved CR/PR was 10.9 months (95% CI 8.1–11.4). The incidence of grade ≥ 3 peripheral neuropathy and skin rash was 9%, followed by 8% of grade ≥ 3 diarrhea and 4% of grade ≥ 3 hyperglycemia. Conclusions The results of our large international retrospective study confirm the effectiveness of EV and endorse its use in the population of patients with mUC treated with EV following the frontline platinum-based chemotherapy and subsequent maintenance treatment with avelumab. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11523-024-01099-0.
BackgroundWhile the occurrence of immune‐related adverse events has been recognized as a prognostic marker in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors, the prognostic significance of treatment‐related adverse events (trAEs) in patients undergoing antibody–drug conjugates such as enfortumab vedotin (EV) is controversial.MethodsWe reviewed 106 patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who were treated with EV therapy at 10 institutions between 2021 and 2023. Associations of clinical parameters with overall survival and progression‐free survival were assessed using the Cox proportional hazards model. For the assessment of trAEs, landmark analysis was conducted to minimize immortal time bias.ResultsOf 106 patients, 55 (51.9%) experienced disease progression and 44 (41.5%) died during the follow‐up period. Any grade and grade ≥3 trAEs occurred in 94 (88.7%) and 44 (41.5%) patients, respectively. Common trAEs included skin disorders (74.5%), gastrointestinal disorders (62.3%), fatigue (50.0%), peripheral neuropathy (36.8%), and hematological disorders (37.7%). One patient died of interstitial pneumonia (grade 5). According to landmark analysis using 88 patients who survived for 2 months or more, trAEs were significantly associated with longer survival. Furthermore, when trAEs were classified into “physical trAEs” such as skin disorders and “laboratory trAEs” such as hematological disorders, the former were associated with longer survival while the latter were associated with shorter survival.ConclusionsPhysical, but not laboratory, trAEs are associated with favorable outcomes of EV therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma. Both managing trAEs and utilizing them as prognostic markers are key points in the use of antibody–drug conjugates such as EV.
Randomized phase III trial results have demonstrated enfortumab vedotin (EV), an antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) consisting of an anti-Nectin-4 human IgG1 monoclonal antibody and monomethyl auristatin E, is a useful treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) that progressed after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies. This multicenter retrospective cohort study aimed to identify predictive factors for the efficacy of EV therapy and prolonged overall survival (OS) of patients in clinical practice. This study included patients with la/mUC who received ICI treatment. Patients who subsequently received EV treatment, those who received non-EV chemotherapy, and those who received no treatment were defined as EV, non-EV, and best supportive care (BSC) groups, respectively. The median OS was 20, 15, and 7 months in the EV, non-EV, and BSC groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients with la/mUC who had a complete or partial response after EV treatment had a significantly prolonged OS compared with those with stable or progressive disease. Univariate analysis showed age, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), dysgeusia, and rash as independent predictors of OS improvement. NLR and dysgeusia were independent predictors of OS after EV in multivariate analysis. Patients without these factors had a significantly prolonged OS compared to those with both factors. In real-world practice, EV therapy is an effective treatment for patients with la/mUC after ICI treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.