2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2454-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

C-reactive protein and the MASCC risk index identify high-risk patients with febrile neutropenia and hematologic neoplasms

Abstract: The MASCC risk score combined with the mean CRP value successfully identifies patients with febrile neutropenia and hematological malignancies and a high risk of death.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…CRP is an acute phase protein that is elevated in the blood plasma in response to inflammation. High values predict poor prognosis in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia [32, 33]. In our study we analyzed the CRP levels of colonized and noncolonized patients and found higher CRP levels in colonized patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…CRP is an acute phase protein that is elevated in the blood plasma in response to inflammation. High values predict poor prognosis in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia [32, 33]. In our study we analyzed the CRP levels of colonized and noncolonized patients and found higher CRP levels in colonized patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Biomarkers such as C‐reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) have been used to fortify adult risk systems successfully . Three paediatric clinical decision rules have utilised biomarkers to guide risk stratification (CRP in two rules and PCT in one).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the Clinical Index of Stable Febrile Neutropenia (CISNE) scaore [29], the alternative to MASCC score, has poor sensitivity and thus has limited usefulness in high-risk patients. While prior investigators have validated the MASCC score in low-risk patients hospitalized for FN, its use in high-risk patients has been less frequently studied [30][31][32][33][34][35]. One validation study, with a goal of identifying high-risk patients who might be candidates for hematopoietic growth factor, correctly predicted 98.3% of low-risk patients and 86.4% of high-risk patients [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One validation study, with a goal of identifying high-risk patients who might be candidates for hematopoietic growth factor, correctly predicted 98.3% of low-risk patients and 86.4% of high-risk patients [30]. Other studies have (a) identified patients at a high risk of complications by calculating the score at 48 and 72 h, adding a measure of organ dysfunction [31]; (b) attempted to combine MASCC score of < 21 with Creactive protein or procalcitonin to predict poor outcomes [32][33][34]; and (c) examined MASCC score's calibration to identify the risk of mortality and the need for ICU level of care among patients with hematologic malignancies [35]. These studies were limited in that most were done in the ED setting, and none of them examined the use of goals of care discussions in patients with a high risk of poor outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%