1993
DOI: 10.1016/0014-2999(93)90617-q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

C-terminal calcitonin gene-related peptide fragments and vasopressin but not somatostatin-28 induce miosis in monkeys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies report that the pupil generally constricts after cataract surgery, 22 probably because of the traumatic release of miotic neuropeptides. [23][24][25] In our study, pupil diameter was approximately 0.5 mm smaller immediately after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Previous studies report that the pupil generally constricts after cataract surgery, 22 probably because of the traumatic release of miotic neuropeptides. [23][24][25] In our study, pupil diameter was approximately 0.5 mm smaller immediately after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Somatostatin also inhibits forskolinstimulated cAMP production in a preparation of isolated ciliary processes (Bausher and Horio, 1990) or isolated iris and ciliary body (Wax and Barrett, 1993). However, somatostatin-2 8 applied into the anterior chamber caused no change in pupil diameter (Almegard and Bill, 1993).…”
Section: Somatostatinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the miotic effect of PGs after surgical trauma in the human eye is controversial (Camras & Miranda 1989). Recently, several neuropeptides such as substance P (Bito et al 1982), cholecystokinin (CCK) (Bill et al 1990;Almegird et al 1992) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (Almegird & Bill 1993) have been found to influence the pupillary response. The iridial concentration of neuropeptides (substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide) is significantly higher in diabetics than in controls (Marfurt et al 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%