The Best Software Writing I
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4302-0038-3_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

C++—The Forgotten Trojan Horse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Carretta et al (2010) quantify the extension of the Na-O anti-correlation by looking at the interquartile range (IQR) of the [O/Na] values for each cluster; more extended anti-correlations have a higher IQR([O/Na]). Based on Na and O measurements compiled from various sources by Smith & Briley (2006) and measured by Johnson & Pilachowski (2012) for M13, and Carretta et al (2009a,b) for M10, we find that M13 has an IQR([O/Na]) of 0.70 compared to 0.56 for M10. Carretta et al (2010) also find that the IQR([O/Na]) correlates with the maximum temperature reached on the horizontal branch.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Clustersmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Carretta et al (2010) quantify the extension of the Na-O anti-correlation by looking at the interquartile range (IQR) of the [O/Na] values for each cluster; more extended anti-correlations have a higher IQR([O/Na]). Based on Na and O measurements compiled from various sources by Smith & Briley (2006) and measured by Johnson & Pilachowski (2012) for M13, and Carretta et al (2009a,b) for M10, we find that M13 has an IQR([O/Na]) of 0.70 compared to 0.56 for M10. Carretta et al (2010) also find that the IQR([O/Na]) correlates with the maximum temperature reached on the horizontal branch.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Clustersmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Subsequent dynamical evolution will gradually erase these initial differences in the spatial distribution (see e.g., Vesperini et al 2013) eventually leading to the complete spatial mixing of the two populations. Depending on the cluster's evolutionary phase some memory of the initial spatial distribution of the two populations might be preserved and indeed in several clusters (see e.g., Bellini et al 2009;Lardo et al 2011;Carretta et al 2010;Johnson & Pilachowski 2012;Milone et al 2012;Cordero et al 2014;Simioni et al 2016) second generation stars have been found to be more centrally concentrated than first generation stars. Vesperini et al (2013) have found that in order to reach complete spatial mixing a cluster must be in its advanced evolutionary stage and have lost at least 60-70 % of its initial mass due to the effects of two-body relaxation (see also Miholics et al 2015).…”
Section: Spatial Distribution Of Multiple Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the role of the CO molecule in setting molecular equilibrium abundances in red giant photospheres, the [O/Fe] abundance used in generating the synthetic spectra for each star is an important constraint. Whenever possible, we used the literature values for any star in our study with measured [O/Fe] abundances Cohen & Melendez 2005;Carretta et al 2009a,b;Johnson & Pilachowski 2012;Boberg et al 2015Boberg et al , 2016Rojas-Arriagada et al 2016;Villanova et al 2016;Marino et al 2018). If a star did not have a direct measurement, but belonged to a cluster with other [O/Fe] measurements, we assigned an [O/Fe] equal to the cluster average for that star.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison, 47 Tuc, a cluster with a similar age and metallicity, has a much younger dynamical age of t/t rh ∼ 3 (using t rh value from Harris 1996Harris , 2010 and is observed to have a more centrally concentrated second generation compared to the first generation (Milone et al 2012;Cordero et al 2015). Other examples of clusters with more concentrated second generation stars can be found in Bellini et al (2009), Lardo et al (2011), Carretta et al (2010, Johnson & Pilachowski (2012), Milone et al (2012), and Simioni et al (2016). Clusters in which second generation stars are still more concentrated than first generation stars tend to be, in general, dynamically younger (see e.g.…”
Section: Distribution Across the Clustermentioning
confidence: 96%