1976
DOI: 10.1215/s0012-7094-76-04361-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

C1 preservation of multiplicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Y.-N. Gau and J. Lipman [2] have proved the Zariski conjecture on hypersuface multiplicity even in the non-hypersurface case under the assumption that the homeomorphism is a weak diffeomorphism. The hypersurface case was implicitly shown in [1].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Y.-N. Gau and J. Lipman [2] have proved the Zariski conjecture on hypersuface multiplicity even in the non-hypersurface case under the assumption that the homeomorphism is a weak diffeomorphism. The hypersurface case was implicitly shown in [1].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The answer is, nevertheless, known to be yes in several special cases the list of which can be found in the recent first author's survey article [3]. In particular, Ephraim [2] proved that multiplicity is preserved by ambient C 1 -diffeomorphisms; his paper inspired some of our proofs. In this section, we give a partial positive answer to Zariski's question in the special case of 'small' homeomorphisms for Newton nondegenerate isolated singularities and one-parameter families of isolated singularities.…”
Section: Applications To Zariski's Multiplicity Questionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[2]). In particular, there exists a closed disc D ⊆ L around 0 such that, for any closed disc D ⊆ D around 0,…”
Section: Multiplicity and Rouché Satellitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…answer when n = 2. For any n, Ephraim in [5] and independently Trotman in [14] showed that the Zariski's problem has a positive answer if the homeomorphism ϕ and its inverse are C 1 . Since the notion of multiplicity is defined for any complex analytic set with pure dimension (see, for example, [3] for a definition of multiplicity in higher codimension), we can get the same Zariski's problem in any codimension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%