2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2007.10.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

C2 and C1 Symmetry of chiral auxiliaries in catalytic reactions on metal complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 420 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to date, there has not been a substantial reason why a C 2 ‐symmetric ligand should necessarily be superior to a nonsymmetric counterpart. In contrast, good arguments have recently surfaced suggesting that nonsymmetrical ligands provide a more effective enantiocontrol than C 2 ‐symmetric ligands for certain reactions 5. Also noteworthy, the idea that C 1 ‐symmetric phosphite‐type compounds with P *‐stereocenters still remain as relatively rare class of chiral inductors 6–13.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to date, there has not been a substantial reason why a C 2 ‐symmetric ligand should necessarily be superior to a nonsymmetric counterpart. In contrast, good arguments have recently surfaced suggesting that nonsymmetrical ligands provide a more effective enantiocontrol than C 2 ‐symmetric ligands for certain reactions 5. Also noteworthy, the idea that C 1 ‐symmetric phosphite‐type compounds with P *‐stereocenters still remain as relatively rare class of chiral inductors 6–13.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, the number of interactions with a substrate is reduced compared to that of a catalyst devoid of symmetry. As pointed out by Pavlov,28 catalytically active species frequently have asymmetric structures; the role of the homotopic groups or faces present in a symmetric ligand is then to reduce the number of the these complexes. The examples given in this overview illustrate that besides symmetry, electronic and steric factors may be important for the enantioselectivity and these factors often outperform the effect of symmetry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of even higher interest are results obtained from ligands with mixed substitution patterns, 7a – d : in Cu(I)‐catalyzed cyclopropanations the asymmetric ligands, with both isopropyl and tert ‐butyl substituents, proved to lead to higher selectivity than those with only one type of substituents (Table 5),19 demonstrating that rotational symmetry does not necessarily lead to improved stereoselectivity 28…”
Section: Distorting the Symmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Catalytic reactions were run with 20 mol% of (BINOLate)Ti(O-i-Pr) 2 and 80 mol% of titanium tetraisopropoxide. The stoichiometric reaction were performed using 100 mol% of (BINOLate)Ti(O-i-Pr) 2 .…”
Section: Ohmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Curie [1] was convinced that "without asymmetric physical impact no asymmetric chemical effect arises". Modern experimental data support this criterion: asymmetric induction in asymmetric catalysis is only implemented through the asymmetric (C 1 symmetry axis) key intermediate [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%