2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.08.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CA125 and transvaginal ultrasound monitoring in high-risk women cannot prevent the diagnosis of advanced ovarian cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

7
101
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
7
101
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…TVU and serum CA125 lack adequate sensitivity apart or together (15 -71% for TVU/CA125) (Laframboise et al, 2002;Scheuer et al, 2002;Tailor et al, 2003;Meeuwissen et al, 2005;Stirling et al, 2005;Olivier et al, 2006) and our finding of 42% for TVU/CA125 is in accordance with these findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…TVU and serum CA125 lack adequate sensitivity apart or together (15 -71% for TVU/CA125) (Laframboise et al, 2002;Scheuer et al, 2002;Tailor et al, 2003;Meeuwissen et al, 2005;Stirling et al, 2005;Olivier et al, 2006) and our finding of 42% for TVU/CA125 is in accordance with these findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…With these limitations in mind, the SIRs suggest that the lead-time is very limited in the total and compliant group. In evaluating efficacy of screening, several factors hamper the comparison among various studies, (1) compliance to the intended screening procedure has not been examined in combination with efficacy, (2) generally, no distinction is made between prevalent and incident screen-detected cases, (3) the screening protocol may differ, such as the frequency of screening, the cutoff level of CA125 (15 -35 U ml À1 ) (Bourne et al, 1994;Jacobs et al, 1999;Kauff et al, 2005;Meeuwissen et al, 2005;Olivier et al, 2006), and the combined or sequential order of applying the screening tools (Jacobs et al, 1999;Scheuer et al, 2002;Meeuwissen et al, 2005;Stirling et al, 2005;Olivier et al, 2006), and (4) quality measures of screening tools, like sensitivity, are typically reported including occult tumours, while the proportion of women opting for a BP(S)O differs strongly across various countries (Wainburg and Husted, 2004). Consequently, the proportion of interval cancers detected during screening varies among studies from 5/7 ¼ 71% in the study by Liede et al (2002), 1/3 ¼ 33% in the study by Scheuer et al (2002) and 1/6 ¼ 17% in the study by Vasen et al (2005) ( Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Even when high-risk women are screened, the test does not provide considerable advantages 8 ; it does not detect tumors early enough to influence outcomes. 9 As a result, low sensitivity and a high rate of false-negative results of the CA125 test reduce access to transvaginal ultrasonography; on the other hand, the low sensitivity of transvaginal ultrasonography for early cancer suggests that the effect on prognosis would be negligible. 9 To improve detection, combinations of CA125 with other antigens have been suggested.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 As a result, low sensitivity and a high rate of false-negative results of the CA125 test reduce access to transvaginal ultrasonography; on the other hand, the low sensitivity of transvaginal ultrasonography for early cancer suggests that the effect on prognosis would be negligible. 9 To improve detection, combinations of CA125 with other antigens have been suggested. 10 The paradigm involves combinations of blood-based markers as the first line followed by confirmatory transvaginal ultrasonography.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monitoring the patients with transvaginal ultrasonography and CA125 every third to six months has been proposed. However, screening by transvaginal ultrasonography and serum CA-125 measurement in women at increased risk of ovarian cancer is ineffective in detecting ovarian malignancy before spread from the ovaries and no study has showed any benefit in overall survival [29][30][31]. We recommend prophylactic oophorectomy of the contra lateral ovary and hysterectomy after completion of childbearing in patients with borderline tumors or early invasive cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%