Ca 2+ release from intracellular Ca 2+ stores, a pivotal event in Ca 2+ signaling, is a 'quantal' process; it terminates after a rapid release of a fraction of stored Ca 2+ . To explain the 'quantal' nature, 'all-or-none' model and 'steady-state' model were proposed. This article shortly reviews these hypotheses and considers a recently proposed mechanism, 'luminal potential ' model, in The release of Ca 2+ from intracellular Ca 2+ stores shows complex kinetic behavior. By examining the kinetics of hormone-mediated 45 Ca 2+ efflux from pre-loaded stores, Muallem et al. [1] found that the Ca 2+ release is a 'quantal' rather than a continuous process; it consists of a rapid release of a fraction of stored Ca 2+ followed by no or a much slower efflux of Ca 2+ . This transient and partial release behavior has been termed 'quantal' Ca 2+ release [1].The 'quantal' release of Ca 2+ requires a mechanism for the attenuation of Ca 2+ efflux, such as inactivation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (InsP 3 ) receptor channels [2]. However, many studies have provided evidence for the lack of inactivation or desensitization of InsP 3 receptor channels [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Alternatively, the efflux of Ca 2+ may be compensated for by reuptake of Ca 2+ after a rapid release of Ca 2+ , as the activity of store Ca 2+ pumps is accelerated by a decrease in the concentration of Ca 2+ in the lumen of the Ca 2+ store [10]. However, this explanation was also unlikely because the transient Ca 2+ release occurs in the absence of Ca 2+ reuptake [3,4,8,9,[11][12][13].Another feature of 'quantal' Ca 2+ release is that the amount of Ca 2+ released depends on the dose of agonist or InsP 3 [1,3,4,6,8,9], or caffeine for ryanodine-sensitive Ca 2+ stores [14,15]. Meyer and Stryer [3] suggested that such dose dependent Ca 2+ release acts as an 'increment detector' in response to stepwise increases in stimulus intensity. To explain the kinetics and the dose dependence of 'quantal' Ca 2+ release, the following two hypotheses were proposed.
'All-or-none' model versus 'steady-state' modelMuallem et al.[1] first postulated that Ca 2+ ions are released from Ca 2+ stores in an all-or-none fashion ('all-or-none' model). Then Irvine [16] proposed another model, in which the sensitivity of InsP 3 receptor to InsP 3 is regulated by the luminal Ca 2+ concentration ('steady-state' model). Since these two models were proposed, numerous studies attempted to support or deny either of the two hypotheses. Missiaen et al.[17] and Bootman [18] extensively reviewed and discussed these hypotheses. The following is a short review of the two models including recent studies.
All-or-none modelMuallem et al.[1] have supposed that intracellular Ca 2+ stores are compartmentalized and a submaximal dose of agonist or InsP 3 discharges all the Ca 2+ content in a fraction of the compartmentalized Ca 2+ stores. It is also assumed that the compartments of Ca 2+ store differ in the sensitivity to InsP 3 . According to this model, all the stored Ca 2+ ions are released fro...