2018
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy432.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CA209-9DX: Phase III, randomized, double-blind study of adjuvant nivolumab vs placebo for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at high risk of recurrence after curative resection or ablation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The STORM phase III clinical trial was performed to assess the efficacy of sorafenib versus placebo in adjuvant treatment after surgical resection or local ablation. This trial failed to demonstrate a significant improvement in RFS or OS in patients treated with sorafenib versus placebo, which could be partially explained by a high discontinuation rate due to adverse events (24% in the sorafenib treatment group) [157]. IMbrave150 phase III clinical trial compared the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab (Atezo-Bev), and PD-1L inhibitor and VEGF inhibitor respectively, to sorafenib post HCC resection/ablation in a high-risk-for-recurrence population (tumor greater than five centimeters, vascular invasion or high-grade pathology).…”
Section: Adjuvant Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The STORM phase III clinical trial was performed to assess the efficacy of sorafenib versus placebo in adjuvant treatment after surgical resection or local ablation. This trial failed to demonstrate a significant improvement in RFS or OS in patients treated with sorafenib versus placebo, which could be partially explained by a high discontinuation rate due to adverse events (24% in the sorafenib treatment group) [157]. IMbrave150 phase III clinical trial compared the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab (Atezo-Bev), and PD-1L inhibitor and VEGF inhibitor respectively, to sorafenib post HCC resection/ablation in a high-risk-for-recurrence population (tumor greater than five centimeters, vascular invasion or high-grade pathology).…”
Section: Adjuvant Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Adjuvant therapy will certainly cause adverse events and increase treatment costs, but it may not significantly reduce the postoperative recurrent rate. Almost all randomized trials that have been published 11 13 or are 14 16 currently ongoing recruited HCC patients at high risk of recurrence after curative hepatectomy or local ablation. Official guidelines also recommend that HCC patients at high risk of recurrence are eligible to participate in clinical trials and receive adjuvant therapy.…”
Section: Unanswered Questions Of Adjuvant Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 65 Longer follow-up is needed to confirm the efficacy of adjuvant atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. Other randomized trials are currently underway, including CheckMate 9DX, 14 KEYNOTE-937, 15 and EMERALD-2 16 ( Table 1 ). We are looking forward to the reporting of the trial results.…”
Section: Unanswered Questions Of Adjuvant Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, there are no published randomized trials evaluating this approach and most of the current trials are evaluating the outcomes of patients with advanced disease[68-70,109]. However, the CheckMate 9DX is an ongoing trial evaluating the use of adjuvant Nivolumab in patients with HCC who are at high risk of recurrence after curative resection or ablation[110,111]. The findings of this trial are greatly anticipated.…”
Section: Adjuvant Strategies For Hccmentioning
confidence: 99%