2019
DOI: 10.1177/0735275119850868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cabdrivers and Their Fares: Temporal Structures of a Linking Ecology

Abstract: The author argues that behind the apparent randomness of interactions between cabdrivers and their fares in Warsaw is a temporal structure. To capture this temporal structure, the author introduces the notion of a linking ecology. He argues that the Warsaw taxi market is a linking ecology, which is structured by religious time, state time, and family time. The author then focuses on waiting time, arguing that it too structures the interactions between cabdrivers and their fares. The author makes a processual a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Drawing on the concept of 'power-chronography', Sarah Sharma (2014) has for example shown how the capacity of the privileged to speed up or slow down at will is enabled by less privileged actor groups who are granted less temporal autonomy. Making others hurry or forcing them to wait represent two opposing but similarly effective modes of domination (Serafin, 2019). Similarly, Lisa Adkins (2018) illustrates how, rather than rendering their futures predictable, the overall capitalist logic of speculation exposes those who are indebted (and even more so those who are under-or unemployed [p.…”
Section: Unequal Temporal Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on the concept of 'power-chronography', Sarah Sharma (2014) has for example shown how the capacity of the privileged to speed up or slow down at will is enabled by less privileged actor groups who are granted less temporal autonomy. Making others hurry or forcing them to wait represent two opposing but similarly effective modes of domination (Serafin, 2019). Similarly, Lisa Adkins (2018) illustrates how, rather than rendering their futures predictable, the overall capitalist logic of speculation exposes those who are indebted (and even more so those who are under-or unemployed [p.…”
Section: Unequal Temporal Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diese Fähigkeit wird jedoch nur durch eine Armada von weniger privilegierten Akteuren ermöglicht, die sich den ständig wechselnden Geschwindigkeiten und Rhythmen anpassen müssen und so selbst kaum über zeitliche Autonomie verfügen. Andere warten zu lassen oder zur Eile zu nötigen, ist eine Form von Herrschaft (Auyero 2010 ; Schwartz 1974 ; Serafin 2019 ), die sich vor allem jene Akteure leisten können, die über ausreichend Kapital verfügen. Ungleichheit, als ein grundlegendes Merkmal kapitalistischer Gesellschaften, wird so auch in der Dimension der Zeit sichtbar, und zwar als ungleiche zeitliche Autonomie .…”
Section: Die Ordoliberale Durchsetzung Des Kapitalistischen Zeitregimesunclassified
“…Other existing sociological concepts for describing the relations between social spaces, such as ‘field overlap’ (Evans & Kay, 2008), ‘interstitial fields’ (Medvetz, 2012), ‘Russian dolls fields’ (Fligstein & McAdam, 2012), ‘heteronomous fields’ (Leschziner, 2015), ‘proximate fields’ (Lei, 2016), ‘adjacent ecologies’ (Block-Lieb & Halliday, 2017), ‘overlapping ecologies’ (Liu, 2017) or ‘linking ecology’ (Serafin, 2019), are also incomplete, though each captures some aspects of this complex relationship. The most problematic among these concepts is the image of Russian dolls in Fligstein and McAdam’s (2012) theory of strategic action fields, which suggests that all fields look the same except for size.…”
Section: Beyond Homology: Theorising Relations Between Social Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When two spaces get close to each other, they form a variety of structural patterns, characterised by existing concepts such as ‘structural coupling’ (Luhmann, 1984/1995), ‘linked ecologies’ (Abbott, 2005), ‘field overlap’ (Evans & Kay, 2008), ‘Russian Doll fields’ (Fligstein & McAdam, 2012), ‘proximate fields’ (Lei, 2016), ‘adjacent ecologies’ (Block-Lieb & Halliday, 2017) or ‘overlapping ecologies’ (Liu, 2017). There are also discussions of ‘interstitial fields’ (Medvetz, 2012), ‘spaces between fields’ (Eyal, 2013) or ‘linking ecology’ (Serafin, 2019), all of which focus on the areas between adjacent social spaces. Nevertheless, little effort has been made to integrate this growing vocabulary into a coherent framework for understanding the social distance between social spaces.…”
Section: Social Distance: Linked Nested and Overlapping Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation