2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cable plate fixation for Vancouver Type-B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures-Our experience and identification of a subset at risk of non-union

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of these biological criteria can link each other (for example: an atypical pattern of fracture seems more frequent in osteoporotic patients on long lasting BPs therapy) and can coexist. As for cemented stems, in our opinion it is more a biological issue than a mechanical one: an overlooked failure of the stem-cemented interface has been advocate as a mechanical cause of failure in PFFs around a cemented stem [29,76] but a reduce capability of bone healing (less viable area, no endosteal callus formation) and an absent opportunity for re-osteointegration are biological issues that are undoubtedly present. Alike, a transverse fracture at the tip of the stem has always been considered a mechanical problem but it also implies biological issues (less surface for bone healing).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some of these biological criteria can link each other (for example: an atypical pattern of fracture seems more frequent in osteoporotic patients on long lasting BPs therapy) and can coexist. As for cemented stems, in our opinion it is more a biological issue than a mechanical one: an overlooked failure of the stem-cemented interface has been advocate as a mechanical cause of failure in PFFs around a cemented stem [29,76] but a reduce capability of bone healing (less viable area, no endosteal callus formation) and an absent opportunity for re-osteointegration are biological issues that are undoubtedly present. Alike, a transverse fracture at the tip of the stem has always been considered a mechanical problem but it also implies biological issues (less surface for bone healing).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anyway, mechanical elements are not the only factors that should indicate the use of a structural allograft, and biological issues has to be taken into account, as well. A PFF around or at the tip of a cemented stem [20,75,76] or over an osteoporotic bone are known to have higher complication rate than other cases [77]. Conditions such as osteoporosis and rheumatoid arthritis or other autoimmune or endocrinological diseases, long lasting CCSs or BPs assumption, AFFs or previous surgeries are indicators of a local and systemic biological impairment that suggest the use of structural allograft even if mechanically it would be unnecessary [6,9,31,78].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mortality in our cohort was 12.9%, that is in line with the reported data of Literature. 8,21 Limitations of this study are inherent to the retrospective collection of data, the non-randomised nature, the small sample of patients and a lack of a control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This data is in line with recent literature. 8,[10][11][12] In a critical analysis of the literature Graham et al 10 have identified 3 common reasons for failure: (1) screw pull-out; (2) bone fractures at the end of the plate due to stress raiser; (3) fracture across empty screw holes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation