2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.pocean.2019.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cabled ocean observatory data reveal food supply mechanisms to a cold-water coral reef

Abstract: We investigated food supply mechanisms to a cold-water coral (CWC) reef at 260 m depth on the Norwegian continental shelf using data from a cabled ocean observatory equipped with Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers (ADCPs), an echosounder, and sensors for chlorophyll, turbidity and hydrography in the benthic boundary layer (BBL). Tidal currents of up to tens of cm s-1 dominated BBL hydrodynamics while residual currents were weak (~10 cm s-1), emphasizing a supply and high retention of locally produced phytodetr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The trough has a diverse topography with sand wave fields of up to 7 m high, 10 to 35 m high ridges, and approximately 20 m high CWC mounds [27]. The CWC mounds are predominantly found in the southeastern part of the trough at a depth of ∼260 m just south of the Vesterålsgrunnen bank, being mostly constituted by CWC Desmophyllum pertusum [28].…”
Section: The Cabled Observatory Network Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The trough has a diverse topography with sand wave fields of up to 7 m high, 10 to 35 m high ridges, and approximately 20 m high CWC mounds [27]. The CWC mounds are predominantly found in the southeastern part of the trough at a depth of ∼260 m just south of the Vesterålsgrunnen bank, being mostly constituted by CWC Desmophyllum pertusum [28].…”
Section: The Cabled Observatory Network Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trough has a diverse topography with sand wave fields of up to 7 m high, 10 to 35 m high ridges, and approximately 20 m high CWC mounds [27]. The CWC mounds are predominantly found in the southeastern part of the trough at a depth of ∼260 m just south of the Vesterålsgrunnen bank, being mostly constituted by CWC Desmophyllum pertusum [28]. The following three platforms compose the data collection system of this area: The X-Frame, which measures water current and biomass in water (with an echosounder); Satellite 1, which collects multiple types of data, such as photos, sound, chlorophyll, turbidity, pressure, temperature, conductivity, etc.…”
Section: The Cabled Observatory Network Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The team aims at continuing the development and utilizing the experiences of partners in ongoing projects at existing observatories (Neptune and LoVe). A combination of acoustics with oceanography as done by Engeland and colleagues [43] demonstrates the strength of coordinated multiparametric sampling in time and space with various sensors, with imaging at the center of that development for ecological monitoring (e.g., [44]). The unique contribution of ARIM is to establish technology and routines for combining imaging techniques of the benthic habitat and acoustic sampling of the pelagic habitat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though they are most commonly limited to depths down to the lower mesopelagic zone (∼1,000 m), DVMs can reportedly extend to several km into abyssal waters (e.g., Natantian decapods in the Mediterranean; . Traditionally, they are captured as anomalies in the acoustic backscatter signal (due to different reflective properties attributed to the physical differences of animal tissue and seawater and the presence of the swim bladder in the case of fish; Marshall, 1951) by either upward-or downward-facing Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers-ADCPs (Flagg and Smith, 1989;Plueddemann and Pinkel, 1989;Heywood et al, 1991;Ochoa et al, 2013;Bozzano et al, 2014;De Leo et al, 2018) or sonars/echosounders (Barham, 1966;Opdal et al, 2008;Benoit-Bird et al, 2017;Giorli et al, 2018;Van Engeland et al, 2019), as well as with trawl and plankton net surveys (Roe, 1984;Fock et al, 2002;Steinberg et al, 2002;Drazen et al, 2011;Darnis and Fortier, 2014). Remarkably, trawl avoidance behavior has been reported for some mesopelagic fish species which adapted their vertical migrating patterns (Kaartvedt et al, 2012), while there is a practically inevitable sampling bias favoring size and robustness in the deep pelagic zone (Craig et al, 2015).…”
Section: Capturing the Rhythmic Movements Of The Deep Scattering Layermentioning
confidence: 99%