1999
DOI: 10.1029/1999pa900016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CaCO3 size distribution: A paleocarbonate ion proxy?

Abstract: Abstract. Lysocline reconstructions play an important role in scenarios purporting to explain the lowered atmospheric CO2 content of glacial time. These reconstructions are based on indicators such as the CaCO3 content, the percent of coarse fraction, the ratio of fragments to whole foraminifera shells, the ratio of solution-susceptible to solution-resistant species, and the ratio of coarse to fine CaCO3. All assume that changes with time in the composition of the input material do not bias the result. However… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
72
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proxy measures have been developed for past changes in ambient carbonate ion concentrations. One, based on analysis of foraminiferal size fractions [ Broecker and Clark , 1999] suggests an ∼11 μmol kg −1 decline in deep‐sea CO 3 2− concentration over the last 8 kyr [ Broecker et al , 1999, 2001]. Another, based on planktonic foraminifer abundance indicates only slightly higher (<5 μmol kg −1 ) deep Pacific CO 3 2− at the LGM compared to present [ Anderson and Archer , 2002].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proxy measures have been developed for past changes in ambient carbonate ion concentrations. One, based on analysis of foraminiferal size fractions [ Broecker and Clark , 1999] suggests an ∼11 μmol kg −1 decline in deep‐sea CO 3 2− concentration over the last 8 kyr [ Broecker et al , 1999, 2001]. Another, based on planktonic foraminifer abundance indicates only slightly higher (<5 μmol kg −1 ) deep Pacific CO 3 2− at the LGM compared to present [ Anderson and Archer , 2002].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the similarities in terms of applicability for this kind of study, the two locations do have some notable differences. Bottom waters on the Ontong‐Java Plateau are undersaturated at depths well shallower than 3000 m, while the saturation horizon on the Ceara Rise is not reached until a depth of over 4000 m. Sediments on the Ontong‐Java Plateau show increases in several dissolution indices [ Broecker et al , 1999; Broecker and Clark , 1999a, 1999b; McCorkle et al , 1995; Lohmann , 1995] at depths shallower even than 2000 m; similar indices on the Ceara Rise do not show strong dissolution signatures until 4000 m or deeper [ Broecker and Clark , 2003]. Additionally, calcite content in the two locations is markedly different: the shallowest sediments on the Ceara rise are only about 65% calcite; by a depth of 4700 m (and a bottom‐water saturation of about 0.85), that has dropped to about 40%.…”
Section: Lysoclinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coarse fraction is a possible indicator of dissolution: carbonate dissolution commonly leads to fragmentation of foraminiferal tests, which decreases the coarse size fraction of bulk sediment (e.g. Berger et al, 1982;Broecker and Clark, 1999).…”
Section: Weight Percent Coarse Fractionmentioning
confidence: 99%