2018
DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CAD/CAM Constructed Poly(etheretherketone) (PEEK) Framework of Kennedy Class I Removable Partial Denture: A Clinical Report

Abstract: The prevalence of partially edentulous adults that could be treated by removable partial dentures (RPDs) is estimated to be greater than 20% in some regions of the United States. Problems related to traditional materials for RPD construction have been documented. Advances in polymer‐based materials and digital fabrication strategies would allow increased biocompatibility, durability, and elasticity, as well as more esthetically pleasing and cost‐effective benefits. This article reports on poly(etheretherketone… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
68
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…al. (27) also concluded that, the low specific weight of PEEK material permits the fabrication of lighter prostheses with good functionality, this will be in agreement with the results of our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…al. (27) also concluded that, the low specific weight of PEEK material permits the fabrication of lighter prostheses with good functionality, this will be in agreement with the results of our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…al. (16,27) who stated that, digital strategies widen the scope of therapeutic applications for partial dentures as a result of improved design and production control, new materials, and improved efficiencies with adequate fit that will likely enhance outcomes and improve patient experiences. However, digital fabrication is higher in cost than the conventional lost-wax fabrication technique and metallic RPD frameworks, thus it may be restricted for partially edentulous patients with financial constraints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clasp arm still fitted well without any deformation and a high subjective satisfaction was expressed by both the practitioner and the patient [39]. Further advantages include the low weight of PEEK prostheses, the tooth-similar color, a reportedly good fit and high retention [40,41], and a protective effect on the periodontal ligament [42]. However, the indication of PEEK as a framework material remains controversial, as its stability in a free-end situation under masticatory forces is not conducive for a RDP's stability [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…PEEK as a material is prone to temperature deformations during manufacturing which may influence the fit of appliances [23]. Decreasing the amount of retentive structures on the plate by adapting the CAD-design might decrease the heat-energy produced during manufacturing [24]. If a plate detaches a few seconds after insertion, this might be attributed to its greater weight.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%