2011
DOI: 10.1002/minf.201000133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CADASTER QSPR Models for Predictions of Melting and Boiling Points of Perfluorinated Chemicals

Abstract: Quantitative structure property relationship (QSPR) studies on per- and polyfluorinated chemicals (PFCs) on melting point (MP) and boiling point (BP) are presented. The training and prediction chemicals used for developing and validating the models were selected from Syracuse PhysProp database and literatures. The available experimental data sets were split in two different ways: a) random selection on response value, and b) structural similarity verified by self-organizing-map (SOM), in order to propose relia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Machine learning approaches are typically used to map the structure of compounds to their properties, a method called quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR). Common algorithms include multiple linear regression, random forest or support vector machine in combination with circular fingerprints or molecular properties to describe the molecules [3][4][5][6][7]. Water solubility and melting point are two endpoints for which a lot of previous modeling was published [3][4][5][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning approaches are typically used to map the structure of compounds to their properties, a method called quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR). Common algorithms include multiple linear regression, random forest or support vector machine in combination with circular fingerprints or molecular properties to describe the molecules [3][4][5][6][7]. Water solubility and melting point are two endpoints for which a lot of previous modeling was published [3][4][5][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3235 Numerous computational approaches have been proposed to construct QSPR models, and these methods can be generally categorized into three classes: models based on other experimentally determined physicochemical properties; 3537 models based on calculated molecular descriptors; 3234,38 and models based on group contributions. 3943 The third approach was the foundation of initial work in QSPR development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer capabilities are in constant increase, and developing accurate predictive methods to estimate the properties of such compounds is now possible. In particular, quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPR) are increasingly used to predict properties of chemicals [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. This approach consists in correlating an experimental property with descriptors of the molecular structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%