2019
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.4828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cadaveric Measurements of the Left Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve, Ligamentum Arteriosum, Aortic Arch, and Pulmonary Artery in the Thorax with Clinical Implications and Comparison Between Two Sexes in the American Population

Abstract: The left recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) is prone to get compressed or damaged, leading to vocal cord palsy, due to pathologies or surgeries of the structures closely surrounding this nerve in the thorax, including the esophagus, aortic arch, pulmonary trunk, and ligamentum arteriosum. We wanted to provide a data set including nerve diameter, its distance from the esophagus, measurements of the pulmonary artery, aorta, and ligamentum arteriosum in close proximity of the nerve in a healthy population to avoid i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that this method using minimally-enclosing, axis-aligned bounding boxes measures an upper bound on the nerve width. The range of measured nerve widths of 1-4 mm from intraoperative photographs falls within previously published measurements of cadaveric studies of the RLN, 1-7mm 45 , 46 . Moreover, using this method, the estimates closely approximate those derived from the ground-truth segmentations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Note that this method using minimally-enclosing, axis-aligned bounding boxes measures an upper bound on the nerve width. The range of measured nerve widths of 1-4 mm from intraoperative photographs falls within previously published measurements of cadaveric studies of the RLN, 1-7mm 45 , 46 . Moreover, using this method, the estimates closely approximate those derived from the ground-truth segmentations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%