2021
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caesarean birth in women with infertility: population‐based cohort study

Abstract: Objective Caesarean section (CS) is more common following infertility treatment (IT) but the reasons why remain unclear and confounded. The Robson 10-Group Classification System (TGCS) may further explain variation in CS rates. We assessed the association between mode of conception and CS across Robson groups.Design Population-based cohort study.Setting Ontario, Canada, in a public healthcare system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would contribute to the increased risk of provider-initiated preterm birth in this population, given that guidelines recommend delivery between 36þ0 and 37þ0 weeks' gestation for women presenting with uncomplicated placenta previa (30,31), and at 34þ0 to 36þ6 weeks' gestation for those with a history of vaginal bleeding or other associated risk factors for preterm delivery (30). In addition, our results support prior studies indicating an increased risk of elective prelabor cesarean delivery and labor induction (i.e., provider-initiated preterm birth without complications) in patients with infertility without treatment, or after fertility treatment, especially IVF/ICSI (32,33). Lastly, gestational diabetes, common in patients with anovulation requiring OI/IUI, increases the risk of spontaneous preterm birth and PPROM (34), as documented in our study.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This would contribute to the increased risk of provider-initiated preterm birth in this population, given that guidelines recommend delivery between 36þ0 and 37þ0 weeks' gestation for women presenting with uncomplicated placenta previa (30,31), and at 34þ0 to 36þ6 weeks' gestation for those with a history of vaginal bleeding or other associated risk factors for preterm delivery (30). In addition, our results support prior studies indicating an increased risk of elective prelabor cesarean delivery and labor induction (i.e., provider-initiated preterm birth without complications) in patients with infertility without treatment, or after fertility treatment, especially IVF/ICSI (32,33). Lastly, gestational diabetes, common in patients with anovulation requiring OI/IUI, increases the risk of spontaneous preterm birth and PPROM (34), as documented in our study.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Increasing evidence supports that infertility, independent of fertility treatment, confers an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, such as preterm birth, low birthweight, small for gestational age babies and caesarean section ( Messerlian et al , 2013 ; Richmond et al , 2022 ). In the stratified analysis, the associations between infertility without fertility treatment use and childhood ADHD remained mostly significant in all strata, such as vaginal delivery or caesarean section, singleton pregnancy, term or preterm birth and those with or without adverse neonatal outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in a prospective cohort study of children aged 5 years, infertility was not associated with ADHD ( Bay et al , 2014 ). Infertility and fertility treatment are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes that may predispose to ADHD, including caesarean section, multiple pregnancy and preterm birth ( Halmøy et al , 2012 ; Velez et al , 2014 ; Curran et al , 2015 ; Elias et al , 2020 ; Lodge-Tulloch et al , 2021 ; Richmond et al , 2022 ). The role of these adverse pregnancy outcomes on any possible association between infertility, fertility treatment and ADHD also warrants clarification ( Hart and Norman, 2013 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study exposure was mode of conception as recorded in BORN, namely (1) unassisted conception (reference group); (2) subfertility, defined as a history of an infertility consultation with a physician within 2 years before conception, identified by Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) billing code 628 from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) in the absence of fertility treatment, (3) OI or IUI; and (4) IVF or ICSI. 29,30,37,38…”
Section: Exposure Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we performed causal mediation analysis to describe the mediating role of 6 adverse pregnancy outcomes that have been reported to be associated with infertility and fertility treatments: preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, multifetal pregnancy, preterm birth at less than 37 weeks' gestation, and severe neonatal morbidity (eFigure 2 in Supplement 1). [28][29][30][31][32]41 Causal mediation analysis is based on a counterfactual framework 42 and used herein to disentangle the association between mode of conception and ASD (ie, total effect) into the natural direct effect (ie, the association between each mode of conception and ASD in the absence of the mediator) and the natural indirect effect (ie, the association operating through each of the 6 respective mediators mentioned above). We then estimated the proportion of the total effect between mode of conception and ASD mediated through each of the 6 adverse pregnancy outcomes (eFigure 2 in Supplement 1).…”
Section: Causal Mediation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%