2008
DOI: 10.20529/ijme.2008.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caesarean section: Evaluation, guidelines and recommendations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Age and parity were included as risk factors because evidence suggests that maternal age is positively correlated with risk of cesarean, and women with lower parity or who have had a previous cesarean are usually at higher risk of cesarean [1]. High birth weight and maternal obesity were also included as they have been associated with a high risk of cesarean [2,18]. These risk factors were included to account for all cesarean deliveries that might have been medically necessary; the net effect after controlling for these factors indicates procedures that were not necessarily needed and might be a sign of overmedicalization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Age and parity were included as risk factors because evidence suggests that maternal age is positively correlated with risk of cesarean, and women with lower parity or who have had a previous cesarean are usually at higher risk of cesarean [1]. High birth weight and maternal obesity were also included as they have been associated with a high risk of cesarean [2,18]. These risk factors were included to account for all cesarean deliveries that might have been medically necessary; the net effect after controlling for these factors indicates procedures that were not necessarily needed and might be a sign of overmedicalization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in surgical techniques have made cesarean delivery much less risky, encouraging Indian obstetricians to perform more of them [18]. Previous research in India [19] has also found that high rates of cesarean are associated with several factors: availability of facilities and trained obstetricians; source of payment for delivery (through insurance) and place of birth (private institutions); physician practice styles; obstetrician's clinical attitude and fear of litigation; and emphasis on the astrologic calendar with the demand for neonates to be born at a certain time [18,20]. However, the choice to do a cesarean is often made by the obstetric surgeon, who might be partly motivated by profit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study the escalating rate of C/S another study was conducted among 30 medical colleges all over India and results analysed which showed a rate of C/S at 21.8% in 1993-94 and 25.4 % in 1998-99. 7 As seen in 2001 census, the percentage of women who had undergone C/S was found to be highest in Kerala (31.8%) followed by Andhra Pradesh (29.3%) and Tamil Nadu (23.2%) and the lowest rate was observed in Rajasthan and Jharkhand (4.2 % in both the states). 8 The Oldest Obstetrics & Gynaecological department of India, The Eden Hospital of Calcutta Medical College, Kolkata has seen a rise in C/S from 9.5 % in 1973 to 40.1% in 2012.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Because of rise in primary caesarean sections, there is a proportionate rise in repeat sections as well. 6 The overall rate of caesarean needs to be reduced and this can be achieved to a small extent by avoiding primary caesarean done without explicit indications and more importantly by resorting to a Trial of Labour after a Caesarean (TOLAC) which is safe for both foetus and mother. 7 But, patients who fail a trial of labour are more likely for complications than who have a successful vaginal birth after caesarean(VBAC) or elective repeat caesarean.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%