2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.03.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caesarean section surgical site infection surveillance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

10
93
3
14

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(22 reference statements)
10
93
3
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Of 5 very small randomized controlled trials in cardiovascular surgery that compared use of staples with use of sutures for skin closure, 3 reported higher infection rates with use of staples, and 2 reported no difference. 32 Our estimate is similar to the findings of Johnson et al, 19 who report that skin closure with staples doubled the risk of SSI after cesarean section. In our study, patients with staples had a significantly higher BMI than patients with sutures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of 5 very small randomized controlled trials in cardiovascular surgery that compared use of staples with use of sutures for skin closure, 3 reported higher infection rates with use of staples, and 2 reported no difference. 32 Our estimate is similar to the findings of Johnson et al, 19 who report that skin closure with staples doubled the risk of SSI after cesarean section. In our study, patients with staples had a significantly higher BMI than patients with sutures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Previous studies that had sufficient sample sizes and that used multivariate analysis to identify independent risk factors for SSI after cesarean section identified the following factors associated with increased risk of SSI: younger age; obesity; presence of hypertension or preeclampsia; diabetes mellitus; chorioamnionitis; preoperative infection at a remote body site; high preoperative severity of illness; nulliparity; fewer than 7 prenatal visits; longer interval since rupture of membranes; premature rupture of membranes; emergency delivery; ab- sence of antibiotic prophylaxis; longer duration of operation; use of staples for skin closure; and twin delivery. 3,7,8,19 The wide variety of reported independent risk factors for SSI may be due to the variability in potential risk factors selected for analysis. Killian et al 3 included only a very small number of potential risk factors, whereas other studies included a more comprehensive collection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of surgical site infection until hospital discharge following cesarean delivery varies, with reported values ranging from 0.16% to 3.2%. 3,5,6 Although rates are higher if postdischarge surveillance is conducted, this activity is resource intensive and therefore is not routinely performed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Johnson et al found increasing age a significant risk factor for overall SSIs. 9 In the present study, an increased BMI was seen to influence the outcome of surgery in terms of an increased rate of infection. One reason being a decrease in blood circulation in fat tissues is associated with increase in infection rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%