Caesium nitrate (II) at 296 K

Pohl, Dieter; Gross, Timothy D.

doi:10.1107/s0108270192006504

Cited by 11 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…At high temperature, CsNO3 has a cubic structure (phase I) with a = 4.499 Å. Results of later works [56][57][58][59][60][61][62] are in agreement with the number of crystallographic forms of CsNO3 [55]. However the cell parameters and space groups are a little bit different from those reported by Rao et al [55].…”

Section: Cesium Nitrate (Csno3)supporting

confidence: 68%

Experimental investigation and thermodynamic evaluation of the CsNO3-LiNO3-NaNO3 ternary system

Kouassi

Manouan

Zoro

et al. 2021

Journal of Alloys and Compounds

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Cesium Nitrate (Csno3)supporting

confidence: 68%

Experimental investigation and thermodynamic evaluation of the CsNO3-LiNO3-NaNO3 ternary system

Kouassi

Manouan

Zoro

et al. 2021

Journal of Alloys and Compounds

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…DeLacy & Kennard (1971), however, determined the ambient space group to be P3 1 with Z = 9, a result independently confirmed by others including Pohl & Gross (1993), Liu et al (2001), and Zhou et al (2005). DeLacy & Kennard (1971), however, determined the ambient space group to be P3 1 with Z = 9, a result independently confirmed by others including Pohl & Gross (1993), Liu et al (2001), and Zhou et al (2005).…”

Section: Csno 3 Phase II [29392]mentioning

confidence: 69%

Inorganic structures in space groupP31m; coordinate analysis and systematic prediction of new ferroelectrics

Abrahams¹

2010

Acta Crystallogr Sect B

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The 62 entries listed in ICSD release 2009/1 under polar space group P31m correspond to 31 families of inorganic crystal structures, some with only one member. Coordinate analysis reveals, over a wide confidence range, 11 of these families as ferroelectric candidates. One includes the well known improper ferroelectric GASH (guanidinium aluminum sulfate hexahydrate), [(C(NH(2))(3))Al(SO(4))(2)(H(2)O)(6)], another the previously predicted ferroelectric CsNO(3) phase II. Those remaining include K(3)Nb(3)B(2)O(12), the minerals schairerite, galeite and lizardite 1T, LaNi(5)D(6) and gamma-CaNi(5)D(6.1), Ca(OCl)(2)Ca(OH)(2), [N(CH(3))(4)](2)Mo(3)S(13), Li(17)Ag(3)Sn(6) and Cs(3)As(5)O(9). Candidate selection is based upon detecting an approach by the reported atomic arrangement to the symmetry of a corresponding nonpolar supergroup. A further 13 families are typified by their reduced predictive properties, with four others likely to remain polar at higher temperatures and the remaining three noted as having a unit cell larger than reported or a misassigned space group. The primary sources of uncertainty in structurally based predictions of ferroelectricity are the reliability of the underlying structural determination and the upper limit assigned to the cationic displacement magnitudes required to achieve supergroup symmetry.

show abstract

“…In order to get homogeneous mixtures without decomposition, mixtures, 2 g, were previously melted several times at a temperature a few degrees over the melting point. Trigonal [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] a (296 to 427) K [10][11][12] Trigonal [10,11] b (440 to 509) K [1,3,6,10] Cubic (CsCl) [3][4][5]8] b (439 to 683) K [1,[10][11][12] Cubic (CsCl) [1,12] c (509 to 560) K [8,10,13,14] Trigonal [8,9,15]; Tetragonal [3]; Cubic [4,7,14] d (560 to 584) K [8,9,16] Cubic (NaCl) [8] k (564 to 584) K [17][18][19][20] ?…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%