Calcific tendonitis of the shoulder: is subacromial decompression in combination with removal of the calcific deposit beneficial?

Marder, Richard A.; Heiden, Eric A.; Kim, Sunny H

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2010.10.038

Cited by 40 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The studies of Rubenthaler et al[10], Clement et al[11], Marder et al[12] and Maier et al[13] aided in answering the first research question (Figure 2). …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Rubenthaler et al[10] reported the results after debridement with acromioplasty in an open vs arthroscopic procedure (mean CMS 86.0 vs 85.3). Marder et al[13] and Maier et al[15] reported data of debridement vs debridement with acromioplasty after 5 years and 34 mo, respectively. The mean UCLA of 32.0 vs 32.4 after 5 years did not differ significantly and the mean CMS of 74.9 vs 73.4 after 34 mo did not differ either.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Clinical outcome: The clinical outcome was reported by Clement et al[11] and Marder et al[13] using the DASH score and QuickDASH score. The clinical outcome did not differ significantly in the short and midterm (6 wk: mean DASH 24.5 vs 24.0 and 12 mo: mean DASH 14.5 vs 14.0).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Four of the included six studies reported information about adverse events or complications[10,11,13,15]. There were no intraoperative complications reported, none of the included patients required reoperation.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Surgery for calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder: A systematic review

Verstraelen¹,

Fievez²,

Janssen³

et al. 2017

WJO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AIMTo systematically search literature and determine a preferable surgical procedure in patients with failed conservative treatment of calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder.METHODSThe electronic online databases MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE (through OVID), CINAHL (through EB- SCO), Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched in May 2016. Eligible for inclusion were all available studies with level II and level III evidence (LoE). Data was assessed and extracted by two independent review authors using a specifically for this study designed data extraction form.RESULTSSix studies (294 surgically treated shoulders) were included in this review. No significant differences between the three available treatment options (acromioplasty with the removal of the calcific deposits, acromioplasty or solely the removal of the calcific deposits) were detected regarding the functional and clinical outcome. The follow-up ranged from 12 mo to 5 years. Complication rates were low. No reoperations were necessary and the only reported complication was adhesive capsulitis, which in all cases could be treated conservatively with full recovery.CONCLUSIONWe found that all three available treatment options show good functional and clinical outcomes in the short and midterm. However, a favorable procedure is difficult to determine due to the lack of high-quality comparing studies.

show abstract

“…The studies of Rubenthaler et al[10], Clement et al[11], Marder et al[12] and Maier et al[13] aided in answering the first research question (Figure 2). …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Surgery for calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder: A systematic review

Verstraelen¹,

Fievez²,

Janssen³

et al. 2017

WJO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Marder et al, 13 on the contrary, stated that the 'time to return to pain-free activity' was shorter when debridement alone was performed than when an additional acromioplasty was performed. The long-term Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores did not differ significantly.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%