2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-004-0767-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calcification in calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (CPPD) crystalline deposits in the knee: anatomic, radiographic, MR imaging, and histologic study in cadavers

Abstract: MR imaging is insensitive to the presence of CPPD deposits in the knee, even when such deposits are widespread. Our study suggests that the sensitivity of MR imaging was significantly better in detecting CPPD deposits in the hyaline cartilage of the femoral condyles when compared with other internal structures, even when such structures contained a higher amount of calcification.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
1
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
53
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not perform histologic correlation to confirm the presence of the calcifications. However, the accuracy of radiography in depicting calcifications in soft tissues is well accepted, and this technique has been used as a reference in several studies in the past (1,(12)(13)(14)25). Our study was performed with the menisci at room temperature instead of body temperature, which might have resulted in underestimation of the T2* values, considering that T2* linearly increases with temperature (27).…”
Section: Technical Developments: 30-t Mr Imaging Techniques For Assementioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We did not perform histologic correlation to confirm the presence of the calcifications. However, the accuracy of radiography in depicting calcifications in soft tissues is well accepted, and this technique has been used as a reference in several studies in the past (1,(12)(13)(14)25). Our study was performed with the menisci at room temperature instead of body temperature, which might have resulted in underestimation of the T2* values, considering that T2* linearly increases with temperature (27).…”
Section: Technical Developments: 30-t Mr Imaging Techniques For Assementioning
confidence: 79%
“…Although magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is the noninvasive technique of choice for the evaluation of knee, and more specifically meniscal, disease, it does not allow facile identification of meniscal calcifications (13,14). This is due in part to a lack of contrast between the meniscal tissue and calcifications, both of which are hypointense on images obtained with clinical sequences because of their relatively short intrinsic T2 relaxation times (13).…”
Section: Meniscal Specimens and Imaging Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, radiography is the standard imaging modality to monitor chondrocalcinosis. However, Abreu et al demonstrated using histological correlation, that frequency and location of calcifications within the knee joint can be determined with MR imaging [34], yet this study was limited by the number of specimens included (N = 10). To the best of our knowledge, no structured evaluation of presence and distribution of CaCs in the knee, as well as association with joint degeneration has been performed yet using MRI in a larger cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with previously reported cases [8,10], there were no specific imaging features that identified malignant change. The remaining cases (Charcot joint, crystal arthropathy, synovial chondroma, exostosis, loose body and synovial haemangioma) are also well recognised as being associated with periarticular calcification or ossification [3,[11][12][13][14] and are more uncommon but merit inclusion in the differential diagnosis. Bone erosion was present in 20 cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%