2015
DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2015.1039491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calcifying pseudoneoplasm of the foramen magnum—Case report and review of the literature

Abstract: We present a case of a 29-year-old male with a calcifying pseudoneoplasm of the neuraxis (CAPNON) located in the region of the foramen magnum, treated successfully by complete resection. After a 2-year follow-up the patient remains recurrence free. Clinical and histopathological characterization of CAPNON is provided with special emphasis on the intraoperative and neuroradiological features of the lesion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, CAPNONs have limited EMA positivity that is often linear in distribution and typically seen at the periphery of the amorphous cores or the tissue edge of CAPNONs, 3 which may be reflective of the meningeal involvement in the stroma rather than the constituent of CAPNONs. In the 24 reviewed cases of skull base CAPNONs, EMA immunostaining was positive with or without specified distribution in 6 cases (including our 2 cases), 14,15,17,24 but negative in 2 cases, 16,20 and not mentioned in the remaining 16 cases. We speculate that EMA is usually negative in CAPNONs without the meningeal involvement or focally positive in CAPNONs with the meningeal involvement, and its positivity is limited to the meningothelial cells entrapped in CAPNON lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, CAPNONs have limited EMA positivity that is often linear in distribution and typically seen at the periphery of the amorphous cores or the tissue edge of CAPNONs, 3 which may be reflective of the meningeal involvement in the stroma rather than the constituent of CAPNONs. In the 24 reviewed cases of skull base CAPNONs, EMA immunostaining was positive with or without specified distribution in 6 cases (including our 2 cases), 14,15,17,24 but negative in 2 cases, 16,20 and not mentioned in the remaining 16 cases. We speculate that EMA is usually negative in CAPNONs without the meningeal involvement or focally positive in CAPNONs with the meningeal involvement, and its positivity is limited to the meningothelial cells entrapped in CAPNON lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…After abstract and full-text screening, 18 records were identified including 23 unique cases of skull base CAPNONs ( Figure 5, Table 1). 4,[7][8][9][10][11][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] All 24 patients (including our previously unpublished case) were symptomatic, with 11 (45.8%) patients presenting with cranial neuropathies (Table 1). [7][8][9]13,16,20 One patient (Case 5) was managed conservatively, 13 and one patient (Case 22) underwent a biopsy of the lesion, 14 while the rest underwent resection of the lesion.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequent adjacent granulomatous and inflammatory reaction along with an indolent course and a generally good prognosis support a benign or reactive rather than neoplastic process . Of the 65 cases of CAPNON that we identified in the literature, only one case presented with two separate lesions diagnosed 8 years apart in the same individual . The remaining 64 cases were solitary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This entity shows male predominance (1.92:1) but does not seem to have a predilection for an age group . Sixty‐five cases have been reported in the literature, 41 of which were intracranial and mostly intradural, 20 in the spinal canal and four at the craniovertebral junction . Of the 65 reported cases, 64 cases consisted of a solitary lesion, while only one case presented with one initial lesion and the second many years later …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the brain, there may be involvement of the parenchyma, ventricles, corpus callosum, dura, pineal gland, arachnoid cisterns, cerebellum, and foramen magnum 2,7‐11,15‐23 . In the neck (facial bones, skull base, craniovertebral junction), reported locations include the orbits, sella, clivus, temporal bone, cranial nerves, skull base foramina, and craniocervical junction 24‐28 . In the spine, lesions have been reported at the cervical, thoracic, lumbar and sacral levels, with variable involvement of the spinal cord, facet joints, intervertebral disc, dura, and neural foramina 2,7‐11,29‐33 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%