2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2017.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calcium alkoxides as alternative consolidants for wall paintings: Evaluation of their performance in laboratory and on site, on model and original samples, in comparison to conventional products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through this carbonation process, the starting alcohol evaporates and is released. This behavior makes them suitable for consolidation of carbonate supports, such as wall paintings, plasters and building stone materials [6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through this carbonation process, the starting alcohol evaporates and is released. This behavior makes them suitable for consolidation of carbonate supports, such as wall paintings, plasters and building stone materials [6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the European Project Nanomatch [14] two calcium alkoxides, (Ca(OTHF) 2 and Ca(OEt) 2 ), were developed and tested as new consolidants for stone and stone-like substrates as well as alkaline reservoir for wood. Their performance as consolidants for indoor and outdoor applications on wall paintings was evaluated both in laboratory and in the field in comparison with commercial products and the results published in recent papers [15, 16]. In particular, short-term surface colour change induced by the application of the consolidation treatments was investigated in laboratory using colorimetric measurements carried out on wall paintings mock-ups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculated ΔE* values for cinnabar, French Ochre, and Lapis Lazuli pigment particles before and after the 28 days of immersion in DAP were determined to be 3.5, 3.4, and 4.2, respectively (Table 1). Though these values are above the threshold of color change detected by the human eye [40], they are still below the established value (ΔE* ≤ 5) accepted for cultural heritage consolidation treatments [16,[41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Cinnabar French Ochre Lapis Lazulimentioning
confidence: 94%
“…∆L* describes the change in luminance, ∆a* the change in red/green components, and ∆b* the change in yellow/blue components. While generally ∆E* ≤ 2 is widely acceptable as the value detectable by the human eye [40], a color difference of ∆E* ≤ 5 has been established as the threshold in the field of cultural heritage to evaluate color change after a conservation intervention such as consolidation treatment [16,[41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Characterization Of Pigment-dap Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation