2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2007.11.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calcium and magnesium isotope systematics in rivers draining the Himalaya-Tibetan-Plateau region: Lithological or fractionation control?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
131
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
19
131
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with the findings in rivers draining the Himalayan region (e.g. Galy et al 1999;Jacobson et al 2002;Tipper et al 2008;Bickle et al 2015;Chapman et al 2015), many more NCHT rivers are affected by secondary calcite precipitation. For instance, based of the chemistry of the dissolved species, around 2/3 of the Ca released in the catchment of the Yellow River by the weathering of rock has precipitated as calcite.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In line with the findings in rivers draining the Himalayan region (e.g. Galy et al 1999;Jacobson et al 2002;Tipper et al 2008;Bickle et al 2015;Chapman et al 2015), many more NCHT rivers are affected by secondary calcite precipitation. For instance, based of the chemistry of the dissolved species, around 2/3 of the Ca released in the catchment of the Yellow River by the weathering of rock has precipitated as calcite.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…5). These changes are fairly large, varying between −3 and +0.5 ‰, which is approximately the modern range of rivers Tipper et al, 2006bTipper et al, , 2008Tipper et al, , 2012de Villiers et al, 2005;Huang et al, 2012;Wimpenny et al, 2011). However, given that the dominant control over the δ 26 Mg of rivers is the lithology undergoing weathering (isotopically light carbonates, and heavy silicates), this would require that during most of the Oligocene and late Miocene rivers, were dominated by carbonate weathering, Figure 5.…”
Section: A Cenozoic Seawater Reconstruction Based On Foraminiferal Camentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Rather than simply solving the flux mass balance, the isotope mass balance equation is solved for F sed , using the same assumptions for the hydrothermal flux and riverine flux as in the first model. This then requires a "known" riverine isotope ratio through time, which is constrained from the river 87 Sr / 86 Sr of Lear et al (2003) Tipper et al, 2008). Clearly, this approach also assumes that Sr isotopes are not anomalously influenced by radiogenic Himalayan carbonates (Palmer and Edmond, 1992), although it has been suggested that the radiogenic Himalayan flux is due to mixing between unradiogenic carbonate and radiogenic silicate weathering (Galy et al, 1999).…”
Section: Modelling Seawater Mg Using Mg Isotopesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnesium isotopic compositions of river waters are highly heterogeneous. [19,37,38] The flux-weighted d 26 Mg of global runoff has been estimated at À1.09%, based on sampling of 45 rivers across the globe, [37] which is lower than the average d seawater at time scales matching riverine input. [5] Furthermore, although Mg in calcite has a consistently lower d 26 Mg value than Mg in dolomite by approximately 2%, [5] considering that the Mg content of calcite is significantly lower than that of dolomite, dolomite precipitation may be an important control on seawater Mg isotopic composition.…”
Section: Controlling Factors On Mg Content and Isotopic Composition Omentioning
confidence: 99%