2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calcium and vitamin D supplementation do not influence menopause-related symptoms: Results of the Women's Health Initiative Trial

Abstract: Background It is unknown whether supplementation with calcium and vitamin D has an impact on menopause-related symptoms. Methods As part of the Women’s Health Initiative Calcium/Vitamin D Supplementation Trial (CaD), women were randomized at 40 clinical sites to elemental calcium carbonate 1,000 mg with vitamin D 400 IU daily or placebo. At the CaD baseline visit (year 1 or year 2) and during a mean follow-up of 5.7 years, participants provided data on menopause-related symptoms via questionnaires. Generaliz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge, only four vitamin D RCTs have been conducted with self-perceived fatigue as one of the main outcomes in general population samples or individuals with idiopathic fatigue. Our results are in line with the RCTs showing little evidence of improvement in fatigue after eight weeks of vitamin D supplementation in primary care patients with low 25OHD levels (N = 90; SMD = −0.13, 95% CI: −0.55, 0.28) 32 , after six months of vitamin D supplementation in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (N = 45; SMD = 0.12, 95% CI: −0.47, 0.71) 21 , or over an average of five years of combined calcium and vitamin D supplementation in middle-aged and older women (N = 34,157; p = 0.764) 33 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To the best of our knowledge, only four vitamin D RCTs have been conducted with self-perceived fatigue as one of the main outcomes in general population samples or individuals with idiopathic fatigue. Our results are in line with the RCTs showing little evidence of improvement in fatigue after eight weeks of vitamin D supplementation in primary care patients with low 25OHD levels (N = 90; SMD = −0.13, 95% CI: −0.55, 0.28) 32 , after six months of vitamin D supplementation in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (N = 45; SMD = 0.12, 95% CI: −0.47, 0.71) 21 , or over an average of five years of combined calcium and vitamin D supplementation in middle-aged and older women (N = 34,157; p = 0.764) 33 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two other RCTs showed little evidence of an effect of vitamin D supplementation on fatigue symptoms in primary care patients with low 25OHD levels (intervention n = 48, placebo n = 42, SMD = −0.13, 95% CI: −0.55, 0.28) 32 or in individuals with CFS/ME (intervention n = 21, placebo n = 24, SMD = 0.12, 95% CI: −0.47, 0.71) 21 . A large RCT of combined calcium and vitamin D supplementation in middle-aged and older women found no strong evidence of a difference in fatigue between the intervention (N = 17,101) and placebo (N = 17,056) groups (p-value = 0.764, no change score was reported) 33 . We performed a random effects meta-analysis of the three smaller RCTs reporting fatigue change scores and find that the effect of vitamin D supplementation on fatigue is inconclusive and heterogeneous (SMD: 0.29, 95% CI: −0.83, 0.24, I-squared: 77.3%, p-value for heterogeneity: 0.012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testing and correction of 25(OH)D levels are commonly studied in cases of fatigue [7,[89][90][91][92][93], but more studies are needed to prove the effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation in reducing or preventing of the CRF. The VICTORIA study aims to confirm this association through a randomized controlled trial [94].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the included trials fall into two main groups: vitamin D alone and vitamin D plus calcium. See Table 2 for excluded studies [7,15,22,29,30] and their reason.…”
Section: Description Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%